There is no way that two execs this senior would be marched out for some relationship reason. No way. There is something else here.
They probably were involved in serious corruption or something and the afl strategically leaked the sexual allegations as a red herring.
But Hird wasnât the man in char-- oooh, I get it.
And THIS is the institution preaching about integrity for the last four years.
What a joke.
You donât get marched out for porking your secretary.
Yep.
Not that I give a hoot about this, but if two (or 4) people are breaking some kind of company policy, shouldnât all four be fired? Or is this a case of non-consent? Because it should be one, or the other. And if names are named, then 4 names should be named - or itâs non-consent.
Didnât Caro first publish the secretary story? She had it strategically leaked to her. Iâm telling you, itâs all a front. Thereâs is something way more serious here and the guy probably doesnât even have a â â â â â â â secretary.
How pathetic if thatâs all there is to it. Since when is it illegal for 2 consenting adults to have an affair?
When youâre covering up something far more serious.
I believe this case is slightly different. According to my understanding, they have been accused of using their positions in order to gain sexual favours (allegedly).
AFLW plunged into crisis.
Gill - âI never âinjectedâ anyoneâ.
Iâd be reasonably confident that what its being sold as, isnât really what it is.
Optics!
The chickens have come home to roost
So the fact there are two senior staffers gone has to imply something more at play. Or maybe Gill is just â â â â â â because they did what they did on his desk.
âquite separate mattersâ - so, a foursome then, on Gillâs desk, to which Gil wasnât invited, even for filming (allegedly)
They are sending sperm samples to Germany as we speak.
Beat me by .5 secs redbull
Should have left out âallegedlyâ
Perhaps, they had an âinappropriate affairâ with each other?