5 Likes
1 Like
I’m surprised there are that many supporters
War chest hey…?
They are a right about one thing Sydney are cheats
1 Like
There was no way the AFL could let racist FC win on indigenous round.
Also, penalty plus 50 for an extra interchange seems exorbitant. Surely a breach of the 6-6-6 rule actually has more of an impact?
Why are they blaming the AFL and umpires for this?
4 Likes
Yeah. The rules are pretty explicit for such a breach. Umpires applied the rules perfectly. Good communication. If they can’t count to 75 that’s their problem.
2 Likes
So it’s ok for ■■■■■■■ stupid technical rules to apply…except when Rampe climbs the goalpost.
I ■■■■■■■ hate Sydney, a NM win here would have been funny.
9 Likes
If they are disputing this they may as well just have 35 players on the ground next week.
Can somebody explain to me what the campaigners thing is? They use it relentlessly.
Norths tanking game is god tier
I think c*nt automatically censors that that on bigfooty
1 Like
It means See You Next Tuesday.
I believe Eddie had a slip of the tongue a while ago when he called a veteran player an “old c….” and later clarified that he meant “old campaigner”
2 Likes
The question that’s on my mind is…
….would they pay it against Collingwood?
2 Likes
That’s a very different argument isn’t it? You’d like to think so but the cynic in you says they would turn a blind eye…
Either they’d ignore it, or Gil would spend the next week prostrating himself in front of CFC officials for how unfairly they were treated
3 Likes
If it was the good ol’ days they’d have lost their entire score, and shattered the Saints’ 1897 record!
Why doesn’t surprise me?