Nor were we proven guilty. Nor did we ingest illegal substances. Nor were we engaging in any of the admitted acts that these players were.
It isn’t a comparison that should be made.
Nor were we proven guilty. Nor did we ingest illegal substances. Nor were we engaging in any of the admitted acts that these players were.
It isn’t a comparison that should be made.
The Pullman 5 haven’t been proven guilty of any crimes yet? Hiring a stripper is not a crime. Pretty stupid thing to do if you are a public figure with big sponsorship $ and are considered role models but not a crime.
They have been sanctioned by their club for failing to adhere to codes of conduct.
Must be a lot of work going on behind the scenes by all parties. Old Bill are taking their time.
I wonder if Vicpol and AFL house still have their little catch-up meetings to “co-operate” on the policing of matters involving AFL footballers?
this is a weird statement. apples and oranges very much can be compared on the criteria that they are both fruit and we can eat them.
if any 2 things are exactly alike, then there isn’t even the possibility of comparison.
Yep, cool. The 34 suspended Essendon players should be used in an argument to defend the 5 swans players in a hotel room with strippers and cocaine at 7am.
Silly me, carry on.
There is a comparison there on the lack of presumption of innocence which is pretty fair I think.
that’s not what’s happening. some posters are just noting the principle of the presumption of innocence and are identifying some cases that we are familiar with.
There’s presumption, and then there’s “presumption”.
I’m really glad the moral arbiter of the forum has had their say on the issue and anybody else who may disagree is clearly wrong.
Glad we got that out of the way.
I’ll have my say too, if that’s alright with you? Or is anything u say “moral arbitration” while others opinions don’t attract such descriptors?
I’m very curious as to where this going?
Who’s defending? No one is condoning what may have happened.
We are just talking about the presumption of innocence. The media have already conditioned us to guilt. Trial by media sound familiar.
You’re not serious are you?
No one is defending what allegedly happened.
I hope you’re not extrapolating concepts here.
I suggest you re-read the thread.
Actually, don’t. Nobody needs that.
To the best of the public’s knowledge, one of the players is alleged to have committed sexual assault.
But the others just used illegal drugs. You don’t think any Essendon player has done the same??? I’m sure some of “our boys” have done so.
Marty_Funkhouser:
Crazy our fans sooked and whinged when it happened to our boys then have done the exact same thing to the Sydney players
The only thing the situations have in common is a lack of positive drug tests.
It’s actually offensive to compare the two reactions to these two entirely different situations. The Sydney players are not victims here.
Are four of the five perpetrators of any kind either though?
All 3 women involved are looking to sue. You’d think more than one player is in the headlights. Apart from the nosebeers.
Fark carlton
That was 14 years ago now…move the fark on all of you.