Space

Ummmmm… what about more practical issues?

  1. our speed tubes are unlikely to be perfect vacuums (and space definitely isn’t). Do we make a billion measurements in the tube and accept the fastest one(s)?
  2. are we assuming that all absorptions and expellings (including the bounce at the end of the speed tube) are instantaneous? Because we also get told that it takes (various) thousands of years for a photon to go from the middle of our sun to its surface.

Or are we claiming that in these tests light is a wave, not a particle; and waves can reverse direction instantaneously?

I’m pretty sure the calculations for pilots cause they do travel faster than most of us is they will gain a nano second or two.

Not my video!

Also, do your homework :stuck_out_tongue:

But have a higher risk of cancer due to increased radiation exposure at altitude

I more or less randomly pointed a 40mm lens at an area of sky and ran a 4 second exposure tonight. Fair to say, there’s a hell of a lot of bloody stars! And that’s with the moonlight probably washing a lot away. Incomprehensible numbers really.

7 Likes

Oh , and despite knowing roughly where to look, I couldn’t spot the green comet.

2 Likes

More than just stars in your photo. Quite a few galaxies. Now count the stars in your photo!

5 Likes

More strange fun.

Given we can’t travel to the edge of the universe there is still a possibility we live in a sphere. So think of the Earth and walk in a straight line. We end up back at the same point. We can also continue to walk around for a long long time without ever stopping. Same could apply to the light in the universe.

So, due to this that also means that in theory we could also be looking at an early distant and old galaxy that is in fact the Milky Way at a different time! The light may have travelled in a different direction, looped around the sphere in different directions and due to the fact we also travel through this sphere we can intersect the old light with the present time.

Remembering if the universe is a sphere the light could in theory continue on for a long, long time doing many laps of a universe sphere. So we could in fact be looking at some ‘older’ galaxies that are in fact our very own galaxies from a different period in time!

Hope that makes sense.

4 Likes

There’s also the possibility that we’re inside the event horizon of a black hole. The observable universe is more or less the correct diameter of an event horizon for a black hole of the mass currently within the observable universe…

1 Like

And if we could live long enough, we may actually be able to communicate with our past selves. I think.

2 Likes

Is in on the event horizon, or in the blackhole which on the other side could be a white hole, also known in our universe as the big bang.

And if we can live that long, maybe we could even see an EFC finals win.

6 Likes
1 Like

And it’s getting a little too close to home with reports of a binary star / black hole combo “just” 1570 light years away.

2 Likes

I’m in Kumamoto, at the museum, queueing up at the planetarium to watch a feature about Voyager in Japanese only whilst wearing my JAXA hat.

All my space nerd endings are tingling and I love it.

3 Likes

4 Likes
6 Likes

Written by Carl Sagan.

5 Likes

From a time when the US was governed by thinkers, not grifters.

3 Likes

Why space agencies want a set time zone for the Moon

15 hours ago

A screengrab shows the moon and a NASA capsule.

Space agencies want to establish a time zone for the Moon so missions can be better coordinated.(NASA via AP)none

With more lunar missions than ever on the horizon, the European Space Agency (ESA) wants to give the Moon its own time zone.

This week, the agency said space organisations around the world were considering how best to keep time on the Moon.

Here’s why they think the Moon needs its own time and how they might decide what that looks like.

Why do we need to know what time it is on the Moon?

A single time zone would make it easier and safer for organisations to coordinate various missions operating on and around the Moon at the same time.

At the moment, a moon mission runs on the time of the country operating the spacecraft.

European space officials said an internationally accepted time zone would make it easier for everyone, especially as more countries and even private companies aim for the Moon and NASA gets set to send astronauts there.

Who will decide?

Space organisations from around the world will help to decide how to keep time on the Moon.

The idea was raised during a meeting in the Netherlands late last year, with participants agreeing on the urgent need to establish “a common lunar reference time”.

“A joint international effort is now being launched towards achieving this,” ESA navigation system engineer Pietro Giordano said.

How will they decide?

The space organisations will consult with each other to overcome a few hurdles before they can agree on a time zone.

ESA this week said one of the topics under debate was whether a single organisation should be responsible for setting and maintaining the lunar time.

The organisation will also face considerable technical issues — including that clocks on the Moon run faster than on Earth, gaining around 56 microseconds a day.

“Of course, the agreed time system will also have to be practical for astronauts,” Bernhard Hufenbach from ESA’s Directorate of Human and Robotic Exploration said.

Will NASA have to agree to the time zone?

NASA will have a say in it.

The whole point of establishing a Moon time is so missions from different parts of Earth can be coordinated effectively.

And ESA confirmed it’s working with its American counterpart on the subject.

Would it be a 24-hour clock?

The space organisations are yet to decide.

ESA said the international team was debating whether the time zone should be set on an independent basis on the Moon or kept synchronised with Earth.

Any place on Earth has a time offset to the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) standard, which is meticulously based on atomic clocks and the same as the Greenwich Mean Time zone.

For example, Australian Eastern Standard Time is 10 hours ahead of UTC.

How did they pick the time for the International Space Station?

The space station wasn’t given its own time zone but runs off UTC.

NASA grappled with the time question while designing and building the station.

It settled on UTC because it splits the time difference between NASA and the Canadian Space Agency and the other partnering space programs in Russia, Japan and Europe.

Could you have daylight saving time on the Moon?

Daylight saving would be redundant on the Moon.

On Earth, changing the clocks seasonally in some places gives people an extra hour of sunlight to use in the evening.

Mr Hufenbach explained it was going to be a challenge to establish a time zone practical for astronauts on the Moon because each day in its equatorial region is equal to about 29.5 Earth days.

The Moon has freezing fortnight-long nights when the whole of Earth is just a small, blue circle in the dark sky.

4 Likes