There’s also the very real prospect of TAS targeting the small number of promising young players we have such as caddy or kako etc.
If Essendon can’t make significant progress in the next 1-3 years we are very likely to lose players and if that happens we’ll effectively be stuck in an almost never ending loop.
Be great to hear from the property mogul about his actual vision and strategy for the next 5 years…
Not sure about the priority picks but we stuffed the Daniher situation by forcing him to stay just like we have Merrett. Should have sent Daniher to Sydney the minute he wanted out
We won’t get it. Even if we did it’s not a panacea. Have a look at the history of priority picks, not many of them have gone on to play in a premiership and lift their club out of the doldrums.
Darcy Daniher. Was drafted under the changed bidding rules in 2007. However, he was a third round pick which was the existing cost of F/S picks, so clearly we weren’t ■■■■■■ over.
Joe Daniher. Was drafted under the same rules as Darcy was, but in 2012. Possible the AFL ■■■■■■ us over, but I think you’d have to be pretty conspiracy-brained to think someone saw a twelve year old Joe Daniher, thought “absolutely ■■■■■■■ not, Essendon”, and changed the rules five years ahead of his draft class.
Joe Daniher, free agent. We got the highest possible compensation under the free agency system. Not ■■■■■■ over.
For me, it’s not really about losing lots of revenue and crowds if they don’t get assistance. It’s much simpler.
22 years without winning a final. 22 years of objective failure.
That’s too long and most objective observers would agree that’s prolonged failure as a club. Just because Essendon is strong financially to survive a prolonged downturn of these proportions doesn’t mean it should be allowed to continue.
And that’s my argument. This is a twofold argument.
Essendon imo satisfies any reasonable and objective assessment of prolonged failure
The upcoming drafts are compromised and in light of this, assistance is needed if a bottom team needing assistance is reasonably expected to rise up the ladder In forceable future
Why is winning a final the standard compared to so many other options? It’s Essendon’s particular failing, but why would that be the marker compared to making finals, winning flags, bottom four finishes, whatever else?
Not winning a final for 22 years talks directly to prolonged on field failure. Considering the last 22 years in total context at Essendon, I think Essendon needs assistance and it’s not in anyone’s interests to have Essendon in the bottom 6 for the next 4-5 years more.
West Coast received assistance and won a premiership only 8 years ago!! Our incompetence over the journey isn’t much different to the mistakes that club has made since that day only 8 years ago.
We as members could put a figurative gun to AFL’s head.
Give us everything we want or we vote to wind up the club.
It would a relief to be honest to end it now. It wouldn’t be a bluff. I’m sure the players wouldn’t even mind if they were all disbursed to other clubs.
It would be the sweetest revenge on the AFL. Go replace the $$$ we bring to the game with your precious Tassie and Gold Coast teams, just as we hit an oil shock and global recession.