No need to tread lightly until someone refers to you as “Padawan”
Geelong guy…Daniel (?) Snell
1 Like
And I also bet his account on Dollhouse not coming to EFC.
So in fairness - he should get perma-banned.
Assuming both are fit and both were fighting for the last spot in our midfield, who would be get first crack Setterfield or Parish?
Lightest player in the AFL era. Played at around 62kgs. He wasn’t bad either but that injury was horrible. Never played again.
1 Like
yeah, nah. ankle breaks suck. that joint is a dirty, stinkin ■■■■ if you damage the joint surface.
‘DP’?
1 Like
Mods…get it done!!!
Should be more permabanning in trade season.
7 Likes
Agreed if you damage a joint. Different kettle of fish.
Yeah nah.
Did someone say they wouldn’t swap luke Parker for parish, straight swap?
Oh boy 
11 Likes
Setterfield has played all of 2 games.
Parish would be a street ahead of him right now.
4 Likes
No, I think Sydney would politely decline that offer.
1 Like
I don’t think they’d be polite about it
2 Likes
Probably not but as polite as these things go.
It was Gleeson, then morphed into The Langford and is now Francis.
Do you think Parish genuinely has that much upside? If so that’s very exciting. I already like him but saying you wouldn’t swap for Parker blows my mind. Boy i hope you’re right.
All I can find is “broken ankle”. Nothing specific on which part. Must’ve been pretty bad to miss a year though!
Will i get shanked for saying i like Gleeson most out of the 3? The others are also superstars.
1 Like
Parish is definitely off limits
4 Likes