Yeah, what he said.
AFL list update
Hawthorn has committed to re-drafting Jack Gunston in next month's AFL rookie draft.
Yeah, what he said.
And the homesick pangs are happening. He wants to go back to Sussex.
Committed suttee when FFFFRRRRAAAANNNNKKKKLLLLLIIIINNNNN!!! retired.
Transfer to Brighton.
Update: Tim Membrey has signed with Collingwood.
That is their bad luck.
That is their bad luck.
Makes sense. They believe theyāre still in the window so really a no brainer.
Culley would be a good pickup if we use a late draft pick. Other than that ise the picks to match a Kako bid, then grab whatever is left over.
We need:
Culley would be a good pickup if we use a late draft pick. Other than that ise the picks to match a Kako bid, then grab whatever is left over.
We should only pick up Culley if itās on a 1 year contract with the idea weāll probably delist him next year for a list spot. So total Hail Mary. We donāt really need more mids.
My preference would be to sign him to the VFL team ASAP.
I agree on the reason giving, but l donāt believe Membrey would make enough of a difference to get them a flag in 2025.
Better as a power forward.
Hawks picked up scaife in mid season draft. Looks like a lively forward option now gunny is gone.
Gunston is getting picked up on their rookie list
in theory he is
Iām a bit of a conspiracy theorist. Decoded the signs from the Hawks hinting they might do it.
Hawthorn has committed to re-drafting Jack Gunston in next month's AFL rookie draft.
Iād personally prefer the rookie list got changed to be truer to its original purpose of providing opportunity for longer shot players, especially now with smaller list sizes. But failing that, tweak some of the other rules around contracts and the cap and just ā ā ā ā it off.
Even ignoring that the ārookieā part is totally meaningless, the only purpose it serves these days is to allow clubs to manage some minor bureaucratic issues that are entirely within the control of the AFL and hence could also be ā ā ā ā ā ā off without consequence.
100 percent I feel like they need to introduce some kind of rule that a player delisted by that club canāt be selected by the same club in the same off season
But would the AFL want to fix up an administrative issue, if said issue allowed their communications specialists to generate 30 pages of content at a time when there shouldnāt be much else to talk about?
100 percent I feel like they need to introduce some kind of rule that a player delisted by that club canāt be selected by the same club in the same off season
Technically that rule already exists, they have to nominate for the drafts and make it through both before their old club can relist them again
Those rules mean a player canāt be moved directly to the rookie list without nominating for the draft, sure, but they can still be relisted by the same club in the same off season, as evidenced by the fact that it happens all the time.