There are actually non Geelong people out there who like Dangerfield. Who don’t actually think he’s a smug bastard.
Well that’s the most surprising thing I’ve read in here tonight!
It’s his arrogance. Plenty of players have been suspended because they pinned both arms. Dangerfield, as AFLPA president, has never spoken out. Yet now he is arguing that actually pinning the arms is the safest option - because it suits him.
So it’s accurate to say that the player was safer with both arms pinned? Not sure I buy that one.
You are neglecting angular momentum, Danger did not.
Patrick “Hepelltitis” Dangerfield
Does ■■■■■■■■ get off?
I don’t think so. Give him 2 weeks for being the above.
Patrick fuckfacewanker dangerflog
Don’t necessarily agree with it, but looking at all the other suspensions this year for tackles and there is no way he should be getting off.
I nice warm cuddle can make a person feel safe
The vision of Sam Walsh’s head whiplashing when he hits the ground is all the tribunal need to see to understand how much downforce was being applied and Sam Walsh had no arms available to brace his fall. He has to go…
Not that his face hits Dangers legs aswell.
They’re still deliberating
He’s such a ■■■■■■■■.
We know he’s going to line up against us. IT IS WRITTEN.
I have repeatedly agreed his week will stand.
But the downforce came from his knees digging in to the ground and rotating him face first in to the ground, not because Danger drove him in to the ground as is the picture being painted.
In the 1st few mintues of the game.
Thinking clear.
He still wants to play pickle ball.
They’ve already decided to acquit.
Currently debating Guzman y Gomez vs Grilled.
That’s a debate? GyG everytime
I remember other cases this year where the player contributed to the force with which they hit the ground. And yet, that made no difference to the suspension.
Again. It’s not whether or not this is just. It’s whether or not this is special treatment by the AFL for a big name.