So the right got fooled by a phone missing a cord and the left got fooled by a fake congressman.
We all get duped of it’s what we want to see.
2 Likes
If you read the comments there’s just as many magats congratulating their guy for owning the libs again. We are not the smartest monkeys
1 Like
I’ll put my hand up and say I should have checked that one before posting. Apologies all.
4 Likes
The auto maquiladoras survived Trump’s renegotiation of NAFTA to USCMA, connected to the commercial links with US auto manufacturers.
Mexico has benefitted from some Chinese manufacturing investment ,following punitive US tariffs on China, but faces technical barriers to exports to the US from these investments.
Buy America always wins, in the land of free trade.
1 Like
Previously:
2010 article on this parody character linked from that post.
1 Like
Parody is almost impossible to discern anymore. Real life politics are so absurd now that parody is almost redundant.
14 Likes
Crazy right?
1 Like
Waltz should’ve just said he didn’t fark a sofa to get the debate started.
2 Likes
But the regimes they put in place weren’t left-wing so that’s all good, isn’t it?
< /sarcasm >
1 Like
Those who are most concerned about the “border crisis” would also be the ones most concerned about “socialism” (however they choose to define it).
Maybe one day they’ll notice the contradiction and the irony.
2 Likes
Watching the debate, very enjoyable to watch a policy focused debate, and both were civil and Vance came across likeable (which I’m sure the far left wing nutters hated) and Walz came across as a better, more likable option than Kamala.
Vance won very handily and decisively, Walz improved as the night wore on but Vance spoke better on a range of issues, infact it was about a close to fantastic performance as you could hope for him apart from not sticking the landing, plus he had far better mannerisms, whilst Walz seemed jerky, looking down and writing notes (which is surely a nervous habit) although improved as the debate wore on. Will it make any difference, probably not.
7 Likes
If Vance ‘won’ and it’s reported that way, it’ll be interesting to see how Trump responds, given his poor performance in his own debate (which everyone he listens to said he totally won, of course)
I don’t think he will like being shown up.
2 Likes
Prime example: EFC’s start to the year.
3 Likes
Lol. Not the first time a Twitter parody account took people in. Exhibit 1: Liam Nissan
(At least with this one people should really know better)
3 Likes
He did win, and if Trump is smart he’ll put aside his ego. The heat from the first debate has died off and the polls are swinging back in his favour (generally), another debate would help Kamala.
And a follow-up comment:
The “we won’t fact check you” was like an engraved invitation to lie that Vance jumped on like a “virgin leather” couch or a “75% off eyeliner sale” at Sephora. So after he tried to lie one more time, suggesting Haitians were not there legally, despite knowing that they are, he got all rule lawyerly about pushback. CBS wouldn’t let him pass off racist BS ,just like ABC wouldn’t like Trump do the same in his debate with Harris. They drew the line at blatant lies.
4 Likes
Dude, these people you always reference aren’t watching debates between opportunistic lying GOP pigboys and good ol centre right cheesy wafflers. They’re making nail bombs or running dope in jungle communes.
6 Likes
You mention left wing nutter and Loflyer appears on cue and as predicted… I didn’t bother reading the rest of your post but I’m sure it was swell.
1 Like