Votes from the debacle

Football Discussion Dustin Fletcher Hangar
45

No how bout just stand around and watch team mates do the hard work instead

46

Qk0f4ar.png488×719 30.6 KB

yup.

2 Likes
47

Not one fkn player deserves a vote

1 Like
48

3 Bags
2 Gleeson
1 Hurley

49

No votes.

1 Like
50

1 Like
51

3 Gleeson (ok game)
2 Baguley (meh, but worked hard)
1 Langford (good first half)

52

No votes from me this week.

53

There should actually be an opportunity to take votes away this week. It was the most pathetic Essendon performance in years. Maybe this could be our tiny contribution to saying “enough is farking enough”.

-1: Green
-2: Hartley
-3: Colyer.

Dishonourable mentions to Goddard, McGrath, Fantasia, Zaharakis.

1 Like
54

Baguley
Hurley
Gleeson

55

Baguley
Hurley
Goddard

56

3 Gleeson
2 Baguley
1 Langford

57

don’t know how any defender gets a vote when they scored 70% of their goals with a loose man 15mtres out or closer.
Surely the defenders job is to close that ■■■■ down first.
They even took an uncontested mark in the goal square from a throw in in their own forward line. We forget to defend that ■■■■ as well.

1 Like
58

Hard to defend when the midfield slug brigade (Goddard, Watson, Heppel) are not covering there mids.

59

  1. Gleeson. Least worst.

  2. Watson. Didn’t do too much wrong

  3. Goddard. Got a lot of the ball. Used it ineffectively but at least didn’t turn it over every time

60

3 votes M Hurley
2 votes B Goddard
1 vote D Heppell

Pathetic performance.

61

Gleeson
McGrath
Joe

Langford was good for his adjusted “youngster” expectations but not “votes” good.

62

Yeah, wasn’t walla’s best game but he tried harder than most.

1 Like
63

Hurley
Gleeson
Daniher

64

There are only two or three players names whose names would not be here. So rather than single any player out I’ll include the lot. Most insipid performance I’ve seen in a long time. No presence whatsoever, a team of cardboard replicas running hither and yon.