A fascinating read, the last few days posts.
I thought that episode was, overall, excellent.
I thought The Witcher was good in a “it’s so bad, it’s good” fashion. The writing , pacing, cgi and some of the acting was - in order - opaque, bumbling, cartoonish and laughably wooden. It had some humour, it was kinda engaging in its own way but high level TV it most certainly wasn’t. It was like a chintzy pantomime. I have WOT as the better told and more solid outing, some obvious problems notwithstanding. We’re all different, of course.
And as a Tolkien tragic (can I mention that episode 7 reeked of Moria, to the point I thought Lan or Moiraine were about to fall on the bridge, lol!!) I can only offer this advice : don’t confuse what you’re watching with what the books mean to you, and how they appear in your mind. They aren’t the same thing, they can’t be the same thing, and if one relies on the other for your enjoyment of the books, walk away. I’ve never lined up for 2nd viewings of The Hobbit for very very good reasons. At a personal level, that is. LOTR severely tested me too, but overall I wasn’t too upset. And I think I’d never be game to see someone else’s take on The Silmarillion should it ever appear.
I’m looking forward to episode 8. Though I’ve no idea how Jordan took this whole thing out to 14 books !? Wtf? If it becomes a story of political intrigue as much as a quest, I’m not convinced these writers can get it done. But of course, GOT ebbed and flowed in it’s quality too. Generally ebbed, as it turned out.
In terms of the Dragon, in a storytelling sense, I can still see room for all of them to be “the Dragon reborn” in totality, irrespective of the view of specific characters in the moment. No idea if that’s where Jordan took it. I’m happy for the show to tell me.