Woosha – final moments or finals moment?

Nothing has happened. Everything has stayed the same:

  • We are still the most inconsistent team in the league.

  • We have one way of playing and if that is countered, we’re screwed. Doesn’t matter who we play, if they counter us Worsfold has no idea what to do.

  • He refuses to make any changes during the game, and just keeps doing the exact same thing. I’ve never seen a less proactive senior coach.

  • We just keep playing the same inconsistent senior players. Nobody is held accountable.

And I wouldn’t call the second half of last year ‘acceptable’, because they started playing better when they had already missed out on playing finals.

25 Likes

Case in point is Richmond right now. Missing a swag of their better players, on the road to Perth and getting the job done. It’s attitude and system, things we’ve lacked for far too long now.

25 Likes

You’re not addressing why the results turned around after Neeld said good bye and, sorry, but they were still a chance of making finals when Neeld left and were right in it up to the end.

What underperforming worker doesn’t work harder when their underperforming higher up gets sacked?

Perhaps the players figured they needed to pull the finger out by themselves because their coach wasn’t going to demand it.

Neeld isn’t here to blame this time. The coach still is. The common denominators are the players and the coach.

I don’t know. An aberration perhaps?

Doesn’t really matter now does it? They are back to playing like ■■■■ again, and this time Neeld isn’t there. But somebody else still is…

1 Like

Yes he is, but there has been a shift in the denominators. Woosha got a new defence coach and you can also assume Kelly has lifted his standing.

I want him gone but I honestly don’t know who should replace him.

Who are the serious options out there?

Caracella?
John barker?
Rutten?
Brendan McCartney?
Egan?
Jade Rawlings?

I genuinely couldn’t tell you who is coaching in assistant roles at other clubs these days?

The boss gets sacked and you try harder?
What’s the underlying motivation for that ?

1 Like

OK so I’ve just seen the stats for the last QTR.

20 inside 50s to 8. So we had plenty of it and enough to win.
We kicked 18 points they kick 14 points.

so Whoosha is getting the ball inside 50 but we aren’t getting it done.
Is this his fault? Or is it our forward lines coach? or is it the personnel?

1 Like

Further to Saucy’s reply.

As I noted in numerous post-match reviews early last season, Worsfold as trying to implement what I would explain as an unimplementable game plan. In summary:

  • the forwards run all the way up the ground, especially up the wings and into the midfield
  • we would clog up the midfield between the arcs
  • we would move it slowly out of defence until the forwards had time to get back into position, hopefully having lost their defender in the midfield congestion

Do you recall how, after the Freo Round 2 loss, he criticised McKenna for moving the ball too quickly forward and not giving our forwards time to get back into position in the post match presser? Over the next week or two plenty of big words were said about players being dropped if they didn’t follow the game plan?

All that happened is that we lost game after game because the game plan sucked big time:

  • the opposition coaches simply instructed their defenders not to follow the Essendon forwards up the ground but to stay positioned inside D50. Hence, the times we did get the ball into our F50 our forwards - or at least those who could get back into I50 - were badly outnumbered.
  • congestion in midfield moving the ball slowly means turnovers and plenty of contested ball and we were not - and still are not, even with Shiel’s inclusion this year - are good contested ball side which meant the ball kept coming back into our defence.

For this game plan to work it required each forward to have a huge tank and an ability to win contested ball by large numbers e.g. by 20 or 30 or more. Further, we recruited a speedy HB rebounder in Saad to complement our existing speedy HB flanker who we had just given a 4 year extension to (McKenna).

We stank, the players “rebelled” (my term). They were asked to play a game plan that wasn’t suited to them, against which the opposition could easily counter and our coaching team couldn’t counter the counter.

All this against a backdrop of Worsfold’s mantra of the players having to be “player led”.

How disingenuous - as coach Worsfold’s wants the players to be player led i.e. accountable yet their inputs on game plan were ignored week after week by the same coach.

If I had a manager who wanted me to own an outcome then things would be done my way - no wonder the players don’t like him. His approach smacked of all care, no responsibility.

As the season collapsed, Richardson stepped in and sacked Neeld - who was clearly in cohoots with Worsfold on the game plan and Worsfold’s right hand man. There was plenty of talk about some of the coaching assistants not being happy either - I suspect they had given feedback to Worsfold & Neeld on their “game plan” and were ignored.

Neeld went and Worsfold clearly relented on the game plan as the Geelong game showed - it was clear, live at the ground we had reverted to a more conventional style leveraging speedy transition out of defence and keeping the likes of McKernan and Stringer much deeper forward. I wasn’t seeing forwards racing up and down the ground all the time.

The players played with as much relief as joy and that’s how I would explain Round 9 of 2018 onwards. Problem was, the change came to late to resurrect the season. If you did a ladder on the last 13 rounds we would have finished Top 4 which is what I think this list is capable of.

22 Likes

Yea that’s round 1-8 in 2018.
More importantly, where’s your essay for this year?

FFS he has already given more detailed analysis than any of the highly paid commentators have, let alone AFL-endorsed communication specialists have, let alone what you have, and you dare ask him for more?

What about you put in a bit more effort than “No it isn’t. Give me more”?

15 Likes

Excuses and learnings, FFS ! We just lost to the last placed team who had arguably the games current greatest player and our arch nemesis not playing. It’s time to stop making excuses and fkg learnings. We expected more this year and are not getting it.

He’s had his chance as far as I’m concerned, the end of the season can’t come quick enough now. I can’t get the slightest modicum of enjoyment in watching the team play right now. In fact I can’t even confidently predict when our next win will come. We just lost to the bottom placed fkg team again !

We’ve beaten no one of any note bar Brisbane who at the time had hardly played any games at the MCG in how many years? We’ve lost to top teams again, but hey lets just keep making excuses cause that’s all we are fkg good for these days. If you think I’m angry well I am $1000.00 per year for fkg what? I guess theres an excuse for my stupidity, it’s called blind faith, FFS I am over it. I got sucked in again with all the hype and believed the crap about the list.

Another wasted year, at 3 and 5 we are a joke. We are now officially a mediocre team with a mediocre coaching panel. I haven’t read not one intelligent comment to sway me from my view. if he isn’t gone at the end of this year then my membership is finished, it will be my silent protest, there’s only so much crap I can take week in week out. I’ve got better things to spend my money on like paying off a fkg mortgage.

14 Likes

This year is more multi-faceted; exacerbated by another one of Worsfold’s weaknesses, preferring mediocre/unfit senior players to fit younger players - think Round 1 with Zac Merrett’s woeful embarrassing performance when there was a very fit Parish.

Or then last round when Myers just had to be brought back in to the team after Parish was easily one of our better players against the Cats in the midfield with 25 possessions (12 contested) and 3 clearances.

What happened against the Swans? Parish got marooned on a HF flank and only attended one centre bounce - thankfully still kicked 2 goals in low scoring match. Myers (the worst rated Essendon player on the night according to the AFL’s score rating managed only 11 disposals (5 contested) and 2 clearances despite playing half the game in the midfield and half in the forward line (for which he has never shown any ability). Dylan Clarke - a natural inside mid - would have given us more in the midfield instead of Myers; but Worsfold doesn’t really like young players and sets a much higher standard for them compared to experienced players like Myers. How many young players do you think like Worsfold and really want tom play for him? Parish? Langford? D.Clarke?

In Round 1 we also - at least on TV - tried to revert to having our forwards push up ground and double back so that was being tried again.

Round 2 Q1 is the worst quarter of soulless, lifeless football I have ever seen from an Essendon side. The Saints were horrible early too but won a scrap because of their game plan to zone the midfield so McKenna/Saad would cut them open through the middle but go man-on-man out wide to stop easy hit up passes. Worsfold had no counter for this all game and we struggled to move forward and score.

We were lucky to get Melbourne in Round 3 who have a midfield that won’t run both ways and whose defenders would rather mind space than an opponent. Just the opponent we needed, at the right time. And Worsfold, disgracefully in my view, overlooked debuting Sam Draper and instead played Zac Clarke instead who hasn’t been good enough to be on an AFL list for 2 years; who was horrible that night and horrible again Friday night.

We got the Lions at the right time in Round 4 and played a good a Q1 as the Saints Q1 was bad. But we really faltered after half-time and early in Q4 we looked to be clearly struggling as they got within 28 points. Tippa principally iced the game for us for a comfortable win. North were rubbish all year and easy picking as they midfielders who won’t tun both ways (Hall & Higgins) and one who cannot spread from a contest (Cunnington). We looked better with an underdone Daniher as well compared to Zac Clarke.

Anzac Day was lost between a poor start and the umpiring at the end…and Fantasia being a late withdrawal. As always, another Worsfold weakness came to the fore - his refusal to tag. Pendelbury ran amok for 4 quarters and he was the difference I felt. Shut down Pendelbury and we win the game regardless of the other factors.

We have had player availability issues but these have been compounded by Worsfold’s refusal to blood young players (and play them in their position unlike twice playing Dylan Clarke last year entirely on a HF flank) and then struggling to fill holes when the senior players get injured.

If I was young player, Worsfold wouldn’t impress me at all as a coach. and i got the info I got that came from a senior player.

There is something called discretionary effort - it’s that extra 5% staff give you at critical times because they respect you and know you need that bit extra from them. It’s the same as players. What you saw on Friday night was 0% discretionary effort from our players when it mattered most. That tells me they couldn’t be stuffed and don’t care enough and that goes right the way back to the coach.

You want to see incredible discretionary effort to win tight games from an Essendon side - go and replay some the epic wins under Hird in the first 2/3 of the season before the players were told they wouldn’t be playing finals by the AFL (Finnis, before the Pies game I believe).

By the way, I was also told tonight that the player in question said the players loved Hird and loved playing for him. You could not possibly say the same about the current group of players and Worsfold.

27 Likes

Looks like WOOSHA has lost the players. Again.

2 Likes

I agree with your post, except for this. “Mediocre” => average. We are well below average in our performances, especially playing bottom-ranked sides.

And we are definitely below every other team in the league (except maybe GCS) in overall performances including finals wins over the last 15 years.

Not sure he has ever really had them.

2 Likes

There you go… my stupidity err blind faith has me still thinking they are average, - Thanks for pulling me up.

1 Like

I believe that the performance of Worsfold and the team are symptoms of a bigger problem within the club. Essendon were at one time a feared club. Teams knew that when they played Essendon they were in for a torrid time and a sore body afterwards. Now we are seen as weak both physically and mentally. We are rabble.

It has been 19 years since we won our last flag. That is simply not acceptable for a club that has won 16 premierships and has a great history.

We have no leaders or role models, from the AFL Compliant President and Board, through the revenue obsessed administration, the coaches, fitness and medical staff, and the players. Nobody seems to be held accountable.

Worsfold was a good choice as a stand-in coach when the senior players were serving their WADA suspensions. He was, and probably still is a strong person BUT he is not a good coach tactically and I’m not convinced the players play for him. The Board re-appointed him which was a terrible decision in my view.

The good teams continue to re-invent themselves through coaches who are willing to try new tactics and gameplans but always underpinned with non negotiables like effort, skills improvement, discipline and commitment to each other. Can’t see this in the guys running around in the red and black jumpers at the moment.

Our inconsistency is an indicator for lack of structure, leadership, mental and physical toughness. The club needs a change from the top down. Attitude is everything.

10 Likes