#15 Jayden Laverde - π‹π’π―πžπ“›π“ͺ𝓾𝓰𝓱 𝕃𝔸𝕍 (Part 2)

When you consider how injury prone Baldwin (might get rookie listed) and Reid are, do we have enough kpd depth if we get rid of Weid?

Yes. We get rid of Weid and if we need more depth we trade in someone.

2 Likes

From watching back half of season on tv it looked like opposition teams were running play through Laverdes opponent and isolating them in 1 on 1s.

Don’t think our backline is conductive to Laverde playing his best. He prob needs to explore other options to shore up his playing future.

And given were not playing finals why do we need the depth he provides. Think we’re best to churn the list at this point.

Dot dot dot dash dash dash dot dot dot

6 Likes

N f***king O

3 Likes

Please Lord no

2 Likes

I’d prefer Lav over Reid or McKay atm

1 Like

I’d prefer Lav over Prior tbh

Wow this thread has shifted.

I very much doubt Lav would have done any good on their smalls. He’s slow and immobile, and hasn’t played on a non-KP player for years for a reason.

Prior may or may not be the answer to our small back needs, but Lav certainly isn’t.

3 Likes

Say what you want about Lav he’ll get beaten most weeks but one thing he will do is always compete by getting in a spoil or crashing into kents

Would rather Lav than McKay.
Would get some intercept marks and balls to ground

2 Likes

How far away is he? We need him and Ridley back ASAP. McKay & Reid out

1 Like

Hopefully indefinitely.
The definition of the type of player we should be moving past.

2 Likes

Bring back Lav … let him crash every pack.
Prefer him not to kick and safely handball off mind you, but at least he puts his body on the line.

5 Likes

Come back Lav. Please.

1 Like

BRING

2 Likes

He can replace McKay anyday

7 Likes

At least he cracks in.

5 Likes

So many years we’ve tried
And kept our Lav alive
'Cause baby it ain’t over 'til it’s over

2 Likes