huh?
Certainly should have.
I donāt see why we are pushing him when we know he canāt do a full load. Was the perfect game to rest him, give him two weeks recovery to set him for the remainder of the year.
what other option did we have though? leuey didnāt play vfl so i presume he is injured and draper, although he has potential, isnāt quite ready yet.
Who would have replaced him today?
Looney hasnāt played VFL for a few weeks some reason. Draper isnāt ready you wouldnāt think
NLM
The thing is, heās actually never been great at it, until this season
Do we have a ruck coach? Whoās been teaching him? You donāt just suddenly start being that good at it 10 years into your career
Actually, itās not that atypical for rucks. They often peak after 27.
Play a guy in his 3rd or 4th year of footy on Stef Martin? The week before a week off? How on earth can you justify that?
Toms calf injury/tightness was first mentioned against GWS. In the 3 games since then he has variously had ice therapy at the end of games, massage therapy on the ground at 3/4 time and during time off the field,
In yesterdays game, where in spite of not being unable to jump, he managed to beat Martin in taps to advantage and score almost as many hit outs across the game. Its a credit to his persistence.
Lets hope the 11 day break will help him to recover his calf issue and he will be better around the ground against the Eagles.
This season Tom is doing better at hitouts and hitouts to advantage than Naitanui, but Naitanui is a high jumping freak, so it remains to be seen if Tom can jump with him, or choses to use his body to destabilise Naitanui, which did to good effect against Ryder last year.
Martin is probably one of the few McKernan could take without giving away a size difference. Play him in the ruck for a week. Draper forward and ruck for a game.
This guy is in the form of his life right now.
Putting the ball on a plate for our midfield.
We would never win a clearance without this guy in the side.
Really becoming a leader this season with his performances.
Toms calf injury/tightness was first mentioned against GWS. In the 3 games since then he has variously had ice therapy at the end of games, massage therapy on the ground at 3/4 time and during time off the field,
In yesterdays game, where in spite of not being unable to jump, he managed to beat Martin in taps to advantage and score almost as many hit outs across the game. Its a credit to his persistence.
Lets hope the 11 day break will help him to recover his calf issue and he will be better around the ground against the Eagles.
This season Tom is doing better at hitouts and hitouts to advantage than Naitanui, but Naitanui is a high jumping freak, so it remains to be seen if Tom can jump with him, or choses to use his body to destabilise Naitanui, which did to good effect against Ryder last year.
Natanuiās stats are based off rucking only about 50% of the time.
Tom will be up against NicNat and Lycett.
This will be a massive challenge and Smack might need to spend a bit more time in the ruck to keep TBell fresh
He has had an excellent year and will enjoy a well deserved week off.
Sure to get a well deserved contract extension, but we really need to think about succession planning for our ruck stocks. I canāt see Leuenberger being kept when his contract expires at the end of this season. McKernan could get another year but heās more a forward now than a ruckman. Draper and Lavender are 2 long-term prospects via the Category B rookie and pre-season drafts. Weāll do well if one of those becomes AFL quality, but there is a chance neither will work out. How does this draft look in terms of ruck prospects?
Sure to get a well deserved contract extension, but we really need to think about succession planning for our ruck stocks. I canāt see Leuenberger being kept when his contract expires at the end of this season. McKernan could get another year but heās more a forward now than a ruckman. Draper and Lavender are 2 long-term prospects via the Category B rookie and pre-season drafts. Weāll do well if one of those becomes AFL quality, but there is a chance neither will work out. How does this draft look in terms of ruck prospects?
I think itās a pretty simple scenario.
- Delist Looney.
- Give TBell a 2 year extension
- if they are confident that Draper is going to be ready to be the backup ruck for next year they can replace Looney with a youngster to develop. If they arenāt confident about Draper for next year, then they might go for a more mature replacement for Looney.
- re NewLAV, where they see him might also affect the above decision. Eg. If they see him as a ruck, then they probably donāt even need to get a replacement for Looney. If they see him as a forward or a defender then they will need the Looney replacement.
In the spirit of Finding Nino, Iām trading Leuy to Geelong for Mitch Duncan.
They desperately need another ruckman and we just donāt tell them he was drafted in ā06 (very high too - pick 4?)
Agree with Leuny finishing up.
Will still need āa break glass in case of emergencyā ruck in case both Belly and Draper are hurt.
New Lav a long way off.
Didnāt we give a few games to potential rucks in the VFL early on?
Smart to give them just a game or two, then stash them away for pick 70 odd if so.
Thereās always the State League options too.
Drafting an 18 yr old, unless outstanding, is a three to four year punt.
Thereās always Million Dollar Baby too - his annual wages should be manageable by next year and the Dogs are a push over at trade time.
Luenberg delisted at years end bar any serious injuries to TBell. Mckernan stays on the list as a forward/ruck option, Draper and Lavendar.
He wouldnāt come cheap but I wonder if Peter wright could be a full time ruck?
Scott lycett is a FA but imagine he would be more likely to go home to SA.
Bellchambers is manged week to week. He hardly trains (one session) during the week during the season.
Him pulling up sore after the game on Sunday is normal.