So I’ve seen a lot of calls to drop Dea, that he had a bad game in the reviews and changes threads. In the reviews thread a number of people praised Gleeson. Why the difference on views of both players?
Dea had one less disposal than Gleeson, 5 marks to Gleeson’s 8, but 2 more tackles and better DE%. Lynch had 17 disposals, 8 mark and kicked 1.1. McGovern had 10 disposals, 5 marks and kicked 3.1. They both got beaten on a tough night by more traditional tall forwards. They had about the same impact the other way.
So why does one get seen to have had a good game and the other should be dropped?