AFL takes harder line on illicit drug users

AFL takes harder line on illicit drug users

SECOND-strike drug offenders will be publicly named, suspended and fined under a revamped illicit drugs code to be ticked off by the AFL Commission today.

A third strike will incur a heavier fine and a much longer suspension.

But first-time drug offenders’ identities will be kept secret and they will receive suspended fines.

The most recent proposed penalties included a four-week ban and $5000 fine for a second strike and 12-week ban and $10,000 fine for a third strike.

The league and AFL Players’ Association have agreed to the tougher rules after a season marred by multiple scandals.

Players with no strikes will retain the opportunity to “self-report” their drug use only once to escape a strike.

And in another win for players, positive hair tests will not register a strike and will continue to be used for research and to guide target testing

Club and AFL bosses have been adamant players should face a consequence for every strike recorded under the new policy, which replaces the 10year-old strike system. The new rules will be reviewed again as part of coming collective bargaining agreement talks between the player union and AFL chiefs.

The results of illicit drug testing figures for the 2014 season have not been released and are likely to be kept secret under the revamped system.

St Kilda recruit Jake Carlisle became embroiled in drugs controversy after video emerged last week showing him snorting a white powder.

It was unclear last night whether Carlisle, who has admitted to a “very poor decision” and “inappropriate behaviour”, would receive a strike.

Former Gold Coast players Harley Bennell and Karmichael Hunt and Collingwood pair Lachie Keeffe and Josh Thomas were linked to illicit drug use this year. Keeffe and Thomas received two-year suspensions after a banned performanceenhancing substance was detected in their system, believed to have been “cut” into an illicit drug they had consumed.

It is understood Bennell, who was traded by the Suns last month, received an automatic strike after photographs of him with drugs in a Tasmanian hotel room were on the Herald Sun front page in July.

Hunt pleaded guilty to charges of cocaine possession this year.

What about not guilty drug offenders?

So they’ve changed what are effectively - given you can escape one completely - 4th strikes to (effectively) 3rd strikes?

I think self reporting was virtually unlimited without strikes,. … wasn’t it?

This new system is a huge deterrent and I think it’s for the best.

Financial hit, suspension nd more importantly public/club shaming, simply not worth it for them

I think self reporting was virtually unlimited without strikes,. .. wasn't it?

Correct
Iirc the Pies were outted as having multiple players with multiple self reports over a short period

This new system is a huge deterrent and I think it's for the best.

Financial hit and more importantly public/club shaming, simply not worth it for them

Prepare to be surprised.

Well yes Zimmer the AFL may still do as they please and pick and choose who gets outed etc.

Stating they taking a hard line stance but still continuing to care more about brand protection and optics.

Also, “lines”, hehehehe

How about letting them have a couple of beers here and there, or even better giving them a year off after drafting them so they can find out what life’s about and get a few things out of their system, pardon the pun.

I’m mean how do the afl think it works at the moment? you walk in the door at collingwood, just as an example, and you get told first up along with how you can’t take screamers anymore and have to kick backwards, that you basically need next to no fat on you if you want a game. And then, just as an example, a fat heavily tattooed senior player, says “no worries there’s other ways to have fun. come with me to Vegas my son, and I will teach you in the ways of recreational activities. Now cerbutamutamol or however you say it…”

Something’s got to give. The afl don’t give a stuff about player welfare. That’s been proven for three years now.

And screw the they get paid heaps, they’re adults etc. let them figure things at a little bit for 12 months before they start.

Won’t happen though. young guns generate more stupid polo hats for Gil.

Harder? More like just re-defining it.

Zero tolerance with an immediate 6 week suspension plus placement in a drug rehab and education centre would be a harder line. This isn’t.

More players will be forced to be “rested” due to “general soreness”.
AFL image protection in full swing.

I think the whole thing is a crock. Nothing to do with player welfare and everything to do with the “image and brand of the AFL”.
If they’re not taking it on game day who cares, it should be up to the club to sort it out just like they try to with evil alcohol.

So if you have 2 strikes to your name before this decision came in do you get a free pass until your 3rd strike.

Not sure why you wouldn’t be counting hair Testing as a strike either

How about letting them have a couple of beers here and there, or even better giving them a year off after drafting them so they can find out what life's about and get a few things out of their system, pardon the pun.

I’m mean how do the afl think it works at the moment? you walk in the door at collingwood, just as an example, and you get told first up along with how you can’t take screamers anymore and have to kick backwards, that you basically need next to no fat on you if you want a game. And then, just as an example, a fat heavily tattooed senior player, says “no worries there’s other ways to have fun. come with me to Vegas my son, and I will teach you in the ways of recreational activities. Now cerbutamutamol or however you say it…”

Something’s got to give. The afl don’t give a stuff about player welfare. That’s been proven for three years now.

And screw the they get paid heaps, they’re adults etc. let them figure things at a little bit for 12 months before they start.

Won’t happen though. young guns generate more stupid polo hats for Gil.

Somethings gotta give, so your hopefully tongue in cheek proposal is to send them off for a year long party in the hope they get all the drug taking and partying out of their system, so they can come back from day dot and be model citizens ?
how do you honestly see that working out ?

it’s the same as anywhere really, actions don’t have consequences. Pretty much everyone knows the afl illicit drug policy is as others have said in here more about image protection.
The only thing those idiot afl wankers didn’t factor into any of their plans is the absolute stupidity of players to either allow themselves to be pictured or dumb enough to film and distribute said bad behaviour themselves.

nothing will “give” or break until a current day player does something incredible stupid or dies due to drug taking, only then will they be forced into action as the public outcry will outweigh their communication specialists ability to cover it up.

Mainwarings (sp) death did nothing, cousins acting out did nothing, 5 players being busted in one year has has minimal changes.
So again nothing will drastically change until a big major bad event happens with a current day player.

The rest is just viewpoints on ones outlook on drugs, and that discussion has been done to death on here, can see it spiraling into that sooner rather than later in here.

Carlol likes a hard line.

Harder? More like just re-defining it.

Zero tolerance with an immediate 6 week suspension plus placement in a drug rehab and education centre would be a harder line. This isn’t.

Lol.

Do you even know what rehab is? Or what it’s used for?

Harder? More like just re-defining it.

Zero tolerance with an immediate 6 week suspension plus placement in a drug rehab and education centre would be a harder line. This isn’t.

Lol.

Do you even know what rehab is? Or what it’s used for?

get back on the skateboard quicker?

Harder? More like just re-defining it.

Zero tolerance with an immediate 6 week suspension plus placement in a drug rehab and education centre would be a harder line. This isn’t.

Lol.

Do you even know what rehab is? Or what it’s used for?

get back on the skateboard quicker?

Topical