AFL - Terrible Ideas, Too Many Ideas, No Idea…

as it pertains to integrity and competition manipulation, what you’ve described isn’t the provision of false information because it’s not attempting to interfere with the natural course of a game

an example of what would make it false information is the player not being listed on the team sheet (information), but taking the field anyway (false). which is already governed by another set of rules.

gambling is inherently risky. there’s no such thing as infallible information in that context.

it’d be like trying to invalidate the over/under disposals bet because they were getting tagged.

At least with us we know our players are legit injured.

Yeah, they get too much practice at that.

Well that died out quickly, well swept

AFL boss reportedly rejects idea ‘100 players’ exploit drug policy

Fox Footy

AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon has reportedly had his say about the number of players exploiting the current drug policy.

AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon has reportedly informed all 18 clubs that the league’s Illicit Drugs Policy will retain its current “health-based” form, despite reports that a major revamp to a more “punitive” rule was pending.

According to The Age, Dillon held a private briefing with the club chiefs where he told them bombshell claims that up to 100 players were involved in knowingly circumventing current rules were “wildly exaggerated”.

Watch every game of every round this Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE with no ad-breaks during play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Start your free trial today >

The competition has been rocked following MP Andrew Wilkie’s statement in parliament about a former Melbourne Football Club doctor’s claim that AFL teams knowingly exploited the league’s three-strike regulations.

Axed Demons staffer Dr Zeeshan Arain had claimed the league orchestrated clandestine drug tests to assist players who feared testing positive on match day in avoiding being detected.

Andrew Dillon has addressed AFL clubs over the scandal. (Photo by Michael Willson/AFL Photos via Getty Images)

Andrew Dillon has addressed AFL clubs over the scandal. (Photo by Michael Willson/AFL Photos via Getty Images)

Arain asserted that club doctors urged players who tested positive privately to feign injuries so as to not have to undergo testing on match days.

On Wednesday evening, former Collingwood president Eddie McGuire told Footy Classifiedthat the league’s powerbrokers “are going to bring in a punitive code”, tipping the new guidelines to be cemented by July to be introduced ahead of next season.

McGuire said the more stringent code would comprise less leniency, outlaying the potential time spent out of the game for a player who tested positive to an illicit substance.

“We’re nominating six weeks (out of the game),” said McGuire on Wednesday. “Now, it might be four weeks, but what they want to do is to normalise it, if you like,” he said.

“So, (for example) ‘Lloyd out; hamstring. Joe Blow out; drugs’.”

Eddie McGuire weighed into the current drugs saga. Picture NCA NewsWire / Aaron Francis

Eddie McGuire weighed into the current drugs saga. Picture NCA NewsWire / Aaron Francis

However, according to a report by The Agejournalists Jake Niall, Andrew Wu and Chris Barrett late Thursday, the AFL’s shift won’t be as “punitive as first thought.

The report says the league’s policy will remain “health-based”, signifying no penalty after the first indiscretion.

The Age also reported Dillon told club representatives that cases of players being rubbed out of games due to a secret positive result were “wildly exaggerated” — which opposes a Wednesday report by the Herald Sun that asserted “about 100” active players have been “granted secret immunity” from the AFL’s policy.

Publicly, in light of the saga and having assessed the validity of Wilkie’s claims, Dillon has said the AFL is currently in the process of reviewing its 19-year-old drugs policy.

The league has also stated it remains “unapologetic” about club doctors taking steps to prevent positive-tested players from playing or training after an admission weekly testing has been taking place for “some time”.

Originally published as AFL boss reportedly rejects idea ‘100 players’ exploit drug policy

1 Like

So the AFL are doing this to ensure that players do not get caught by official testers, but does that mean that they are accepting that players train I.e work during the week with drugs in the system

funnily enough, it’s actually pretty hard from a regulatory/legal standpoint to pin down exactly what’s been done wrong here

incredibly bad vibes for sure, but it’s not a breach of anything

1 Like

Doesn’t sound familiar, cannot remember and positive tests from Essendon players testing, was a bad vibe/look and ■■■■ didnt the AFL go to the town in us

I hope these people aren’t bring the game into disrepute. That’s a paddlin’ and draft sanctions

:100: agree.

Difference is we self reported and no one is dumb enough to do that before or after, they are doing what should have been done, deny, play dumb and sweep it under the rub

They DID go to town on us BUT there were NO positive tests from Essendon players - even when they sent samples to the super-duper lab in Cologne.

1 Like

Media and journalists wars. The Hun in particular in the Murdochracy wants to bring down the AFL and its hierarchy.
Fairfax and journos like Chip sniffing the wind.

Maybe a breach of criminal law

You only have to read this Sydney Murdoch papers and news.com.au to know they try put down the afl at any chance they get and pump up the nrl religiously. It’s amazing considering they are technically rights holders through foxtel of the afl.

I, for one, welcome our Murdoch overlord.

Usain Bolt was a crap soccer player. Doesn’t always translate.

According to 7 News

Norwood have launched a bid to become the AFL’s 20th team

Why would the AFL want 3 teams in SA?

It’s either SA or 3rd team in Perth, nobody else could sustain one

5 Likes