Ahmed Saad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another piece of their circumcision defence would be Charter sayin he was asked what doses to give, and potentially ordered from china "enough to treat 44 players" or something hysterical like that which was reported.

What defence?
No means no.

Allegedly.

 

I'm still unsure what a circumcision defence is. 

 

Circumstantial? Although, it's not a defence, it's a prosecution.

 

A circumcision defence is based on a tip-off.

 

Case has to be heard in front of a public Jewry

 

Ah...the unkindest cut of all. They say it doesn't hurt, but I  can tell you I couldn't walk for a year afterwards.

 

Were you trying to just amble along? Or at more of a bris pace?

 

On a related note, in the 3 years I worked for the (Richard) Pratt Group from '84-'87, we had a guy (also a goy) called Trevor Moyle there. All the forbie-two's used to ■■■■ themselves when they heard his name.

K

 

....is G-Unit still around to interpret that joke for us?

K

 

....is G-Unit still around to interpret that joke for us?

a Mohl is the Jewish guy who snips the foreskins.

What's a "Goy" and a forbie-two?

What's a "Goy" and a forbie-two?

a)

a Jew

 

b)

a Jew (rhyming slang)

A goy is a non-Jew, as in a 'shabbas goy' is the Gentile who performs Jews' tasks for them on the Sabbath when they're not allowed to.

 

A forbie-two is a Red Sea Pedestrian. A ki****ke (ignore the asterisks) is a bad Jew, a la Shylock, G-Unit or Fagan.

 

Living in North Caulfield for 14 years taught me a thing or two, as did playing cricket for them for 24 years....only 25 or so Jewish players though, over those 24 years. The dinky-di forbies played for Ajax. The real dinky-di forbies didn't play at all, it being a Saturday and all.

Knew a bloke who had a circumcision as an adult.

 

New girlfriend insisted.

 

The doctor who performed the procedure was a trainee of sorts.

 

He needed a c*ck reconstruction afterwards.

Knew a bloke who had a circumcision as an adult.

 

New girlfriend insisted.

 

The doctor who performed the procedure was a trainee of sorts.

 

He needed a c*ck reconstruction afterwards.

■■■■■■ hell. Hope he got himself a new girlfriend after that, actually he should of got himself a new girlfriend after she insisted,

When he gets his penalty does that mean he can't play any sport at any level.

Whilst I'm a little hazy on the specifics, this is my understanding:

 

He stays registered under ASADA, and cannot participate in any sport at any level, and sees out the penalty (we'll say 2 years in this case)

 

He officially "retires" from ASADA, and is free to compete in any and all events not governed by them , however should he choose to return to the AFL he would first have to see out whatever is left of his 2 year suspension

 

Knew a bloke who had a circumcision as an adult.

 

New girlfriend insisted.

 

The doctor who performed the procedure was a trainee of sorts.

 

He needed a c*ck reconstruction afterwards.

■■■■■■ hell. Hope he got himself a new girlfriend after that, actually he should of got himself a new girlfriend after she insisted,

 

Maybe he could have done with a new boyfriend instead.

Did I hear right that today he was given an 18 month ban back dated to August?

Did I hear right that today he was given an 18 month ban back dated to August?

The AFL does not leak.

Saady.

I’m sure we’ll all sleep better knowing that a kid who drank a sports drink on the wrong day has been suspended for 18 months.

Should’ve got 2 years, purely going by precedent of the recent Average Joe cases.

You'd hope the AFL would allow him to be listed by St Kilda in a similar way to Rama when he was undergoing cancer treatment.

Absolutely disgraceful. Really feel bad for the kid. Just took the wrong drink on a specific day. Any more retarded logic?

 

Anyone else reading FB comments about this, "How are EFC players not suspended yet? Why does Jobe still have his Brownlow?"

 

I think they're forgetting that Saad actually tested positive, we never did.

You'd hope the AFL would allow him to be listed by St Kilda in a similar way to Rama when he was undergoing cancer treatment.

Have no idea how you can come up with such a ridiculous comparison. Rama had an illness that was completely outside of his control.

Do I think Ahmed Saad deliberately set out to take a banned substance, no, probably not, but he ordered an energy drink over the Internet and did not bother to check with his club doctor, or any other sports medic or anyone who might know as to whether all of the ingredients in it were legal.

 

Besides when the AFL changed the rookie rules especially for Rama, it was because at the time it was against the rules for anyone who had previously been on an AFL to be selected as a rookie listed player. That is obviously no the case any longer.

Should've got 2 years, purely going by precedent of the recent Average Joe cases.

Yep that VFL player will be ■■■■■■ if ASADA doesn't appeal the ban.

 

After all he got two years for ordering a energy drink over the Internet that had a banned substance in it, he never actually received it, let alone use it. Originally got 6 months only for ASADA to appeal and get it bumped up to the full 2 years.

 

You'd hope the AFL would allow him to be listed by St Kilda in a similar way to Rama when he was undergoing cancer treatment.

Have no idea how you can come up with such a ridiculous comparison. Rama had an illness that was completely outside of his control.

Do I think Ahmed Saad deliberately set out to take a banned substance, no, probably not, but he ordered an energy drink over the Internet and did not bother to check with his club doctor, or any other sports medic or anyone who might know as to whether all of the ingredients in it were legal.

 

Besides when the AFL changed the rookie rules especially for Rama, it was because at the time it was against the rules for anyone who had previously been on an AFL to be selected as a rookie listed player. That is obviously no the case any longer.

 

You have it a bit wrong - It's an energy drink that was provided by his sponsor - One that he would have taken many times before - On match day and non match day - And it's only prohibited on match day.