Andrew Gaff - RFA

No farking way!!

1 Like

I haven’t heard anything regarding Essendon putting an offer in front of Gaff.

We are after Setterfield and Shiel.

1 Like

This is just ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  confusing!

Well…that’s my point. Something to consider. I rate him that highly.

1 Like

Read this stuff for a bit of fun, but don’t take any of it too seriously.

1 Like

I know right? In 7 years time, he’ll be coming off his third Brownlow and fifth premiership. We don’t want him walking out the door for nothing. Offer Gaff 8 years!

2 Likes

Gaffyfest

1 Like

Ha! That’s the spirit, beautiful! :joy:

Only according to the rules.

2 Likes

The nearest club to Glenferrie Street is North Melbourne… :wink:

Our last pick 8 goes allright.

I’m very reluctant to give it away just becuase trades.

Essendon have a 6 year deal infront of Andrew, and I can almost guarantee he will be at EFC next season.

This is what I believe will happen.

West Coast dont match
P17 or so as Comp

Essendon trade guelfi + 8 for 17 and x 2nd rounder… yes we go backwards but it’s so they don’t match.
8 goes elsewhere as part of a package for Kelly or whoever else they are chasing.

I still don’t understand how Essendon could be this involved in getting Gaff and not one media outlet has mentioned it.

Why the secrecy?

When does the media get it right this early?

You can’t do a trade where the value is clearly not balanced.

Only way clubs have sometimes got around this is via future picks included (as their value is unknown) but even so it can’t be so blatant.

Could be a future first then, but that could definitely eventuate.

I wouldn’t necessarily worry about future cap pressures; Hurley, Hooker, Heppell, Zaharakis and Bellchambers are likely in their max contracts now and will likely be on reducing contracts from here on.

We’ve also drafted and built a team of kids who have leaderships qualities and value on field success, the type of guys who willing take unders to keep a group together.

1 Like

Another person who signed up 16 hours ago declaring with almost certainty that Gaff is coming to Essendon and ā€œconvenientlyā€ throws in Guelfi as the sweetener. I say conveniently because that the very scenario that’s being talked about today

5 Likes

How can you say it’s clearly not balanced. Who’s to say the value of Guelfi?

About as often as anonymous internet forum posters.

2 Likes