is he though? they don’t usually refer to salary as a household salary . tax cuts they are talking about are not per household as such it’s per individual . if 160 K is average , I’m way behind average
Yeah, that’s what i mean. It’s been a long time since i’ve had to account for spousal income on my taxes so i don['t really know how it works any more, but I’m pretty sure it’s taken into account. I don’t know exactly what Chalmers was thinking there, but if he’s saying a 2-income household income of $160k is ‘middle’ then he’s very close to accurate. If he’s talking about a single income, of course, he’s off his fkg tree.
nah your tax rate is your tax rate , you don’t share or accumulate your tax . you’d be crazy to do that , you’d be on a higher tax rate.
you can split income by 2 in a business to save money if you both work on the business , but you’d never combine your income to a higher tax bracket .
maybe I’m not getting something here but I can’t see why the treasurer would be talking about 160 K salary as combined wage when his tax rates are set for individuals
just watched 6o minutes , which I don’t normally , this paladin thing is old news as far as dodgy liberals go with the refugee contracts , but I think federal ICAC might finally have its first case
They never will. They know the Libs’ policies are as fragile as gossamer threads in a hurricane, or as morning dew in the increasingly hot days their climate denials policies are dooming us to.
Zero doubt he’s drinking before P, topping up in his office with something brown, finishing work with the same brown stuff, then off to a bar where the agreement between local pizzhead journos and pollies is still in place. All day binge
I think if I’d seen someone fall, I’d go over and ask if they were ok. But if they are just drunkenly lying on the floor using their phone or whatever, yeah, I’ll leave them be. Having been in that position before, all you want is a bit of space.
Private employment services funnelling millions in taxpayer dollars, another Coalition scam/scheme with a ‘who’d have thunk it’ end. All too late of course, as leafy suburb ‘entrepreneurs’ have feasted on it and will suffer no consequences, companies within companies, in house courses, false claims of success triggering further incentive payments. These are the types that would’ve got the tax breaks (oh, and still will)