Unless you’re ITK, you never actually understand the context. And then if you go into the comments, it’s just people saying ‘interesting, makes you think’
JUST TELL US WHAT IT MEANS!!
For what it’s worth, I wondered if there is a suggestion the PM had the info, which he claimed he didn’t, and the police were saying it had nothing to do with them.
The % amount would have a huge bearing on acceptability. The questionable ways that governments spend a large chunk our money doesn’t encourage me to agree to let them have more of it.
And doesn’t Dutton get briefed on everything that’s going to be an issue if it goes public? I think he was aware of the Brittany Murphy rape story before the PM (yeah I know, I know) as the story goes.
More pieces in the jigsaw emerging from the NSW Parliamentary Inquiry grilling of NSW Police.
According to a report in the SMH
there was an unexplained delay in SAPOL forwarding documents to NSW police
NSW police were scheduled to travel to Adelaide on 16 March 2020 to take sworn statements, but were prevented by a NSW Govt edict of 13 March banning travel for Covid reasons
The SA border was open until 23 March
No surprise that the SA Coroner has called for more information from SA police.
Turnbull has a score to settle with Porter after Porter refused to agree to providing the GG with the Solicitor General’s equivocal advice of Dutton’s Constitutional fitness to hold office ( connected to Government child care subsidies to a family trust - after which Dutton divested his interest)
What is still to emerge is the assistance provided to the woman who went from a Melbourne psychiatric unit to home quarantine in isolation after her return to Adelaide.
In relation to any investigation of the important non-criminal aspects of this matter, I support an inquiry
this is also very carefully and interestingly worded.
which him knowing both sides of the discussion, and being a lawyer to boot, so he’d know if he gets found out to be fibbing about the non legal issues in the inquiry (porter and when he knew about the allegations) then he’d he may not face any legal ramifications from it, but again the court of public opinion will have his head, because lying about when he knew or that will = guilty.