Sure they can “run with it”. It’s a news story and they would be rightly questioned if they did not bring it up.
But do they chase as it as ferociously as they did when they were lynching EFC during the Saga years? Are they camping out on Pell’s lawn? If not, it is not due to some recently discovered morality or journalistic ethics; it’s because they know what side their bread is buttered.
If this was a footballer scandalised with match fixing, you can bet they would be hiding in bins out the front of houses…. And looking for inside interviews with family members.
It sounds like most for this news, is coming from non-football media, who don’t have the worry of having their AFL media accreditation cancelled.
The gossip, rumours and innuendo which these slimy pieces of sh*t like Barrett, constantly engage the lowest common denominator……… have decided to take the ‘high road’, simply because it’s about AFL integrity.
The fact that none of these clowns even tweeted about this news yesterday, is telling.
Its interesting, in recent times there has been a bit of chatter within the media that the MVP award is of more merit and value than the Brownlow due to the fact the MVP is judged by ones peers.
Makes you wonder if this scandal almost speeds up the irrelevancy of the brownlow medal as an award in general.
“most valuable” is an American award where franchises are owned by billionaires, so “most valuable” means conferring most monetary advantage to one of those billionaires. (It’s also ironic that African-Americans are over-represented in some sports so are valuable to their modern “owners”).
I know value can have different meanings but AFLPA should have come up with a term that doesn’t treat them like chattels.