Changes rnd 3 v North

Pretty happy so far with the team but if I had to make changes next week would probably be as follows:

In - Gresham, Farrow (debut), El Hawli, Day Wicks
Out - Sharp (in), Redman (inj), Kondo (omitted), Perkins (omitted)

Also not opposed to bring in Tsatas for someone. Our midfield is getting killed and the issue is in the ruck of which we do not have any feasible solution. The only possible alternative is Wright full time ruck and May at FF

4 Likes

no changes for mine, tracking beautifully

28 Likes

Same, that includes Redman and Sharp for me, patch em up and send em out.

3 Likes

North will have no backline at all.

Logue is injured. Comben suspended.

Who cares

5 Likes

Out: Parish, Sharp(inj), Redman (inj)

In: Farrow, Tsatas, El-Hawli

Langford right on the edge. The two injuries makes it tough for Scott to go too hard on changes as our depth is poor and some better senior players are under done in VFL

El-Achkar is likely one week off going back to VFL. They may pull Gresham card even this week on 6 day break.

9 Likes

We’ve got to keep adding more pace to the forward half, I’d go:

Farrow for Redman

Gresham for Perkins

8 Likes

Calls would be as follows.
Outs
Redman sharp huss parish (maybe kondo)
Ins
Farrow Gresham Tsatas el Hawli day-wicks

Farrow and prior down back el Hawli wing. Tsatas guts, gresh forward and day wicks forward role sharp is playing.

Don’t fool yourself, Brad doesn’t make changes. It’ll be the forced ones for injury, maybe a kid is made the scapegoat, but he’s not dropping Parish/Langford/Wright etc.

1 Like

Parish was our leading clearance player with 8, why are we dropping him? Caldwell had 27 centre bounce attendances for 3 clearances and probably 3-4 of the worst Clanger/fumbles you’ll see on a footy field from a senior player that cost us goals. If we’re dropping someone from midfield he would be in the gun.

I also find it so hard to judge Huss based on team performance the last two weeks. Small forward is the hardest position on the field to make an impact in poor struggling sides. He still does little things every game that show he has the craft. I’d persist and would love to see him play in a team not getting flogged from start to finish.

18 Likes

Round 3 and it will be a test of Scott.
If you genuinely want to win, then you would play Gresham. For all his flaws, he is currently a better player than Huss. On pure experience alone.
He is far more likely to impact the game in a similar role to help us win.

3 Likes

McGrath Gerreyn Roberts
Farrow Reid Kondogiannis

Duursma Merrett Durham

Gresham Caddy El Hawli
Kako McMahon El Achkar

Wright Tsatas Johnson

Langford, Robey, Fiorini, Unwin, Day-Wicks

In: Farrow, Gerreyn, Gresham, El-Hawli, McMahon, Tsatas, Robey, Unwin, Day-Wicks

Out: Blackiston, Caldwell, Perkins, Redman, Sharpe, Nguyen, Prior, Parish, McKay

Would get smashed but who gives a ■■■■ at this point and the result would be the same with zero changes anyway

1 Like

I just wonder if Huss has the fitness to apply the defensive pressive pressure forwards need to apply. Other than that I can see the player he could become. If he doesn’t get Essingtoned.

1 Like

All the changes

1 Like

Farrow and Tsatas in.

1 Like

I didn’t like McMahon or Guelfi’s game in the VFL at all. I thought ADW, Tsatas and Farrow looked the best. SEH maybe.

I wouldn’t drop Parish until we have some players who can win a clearance. I would reduce Caldwell’s CBAs to bring in Tsatas.

Gresham in for Huss
Farrow in for Redman
Tsatas in for Sharp
ADW in for Perkins

6 Likes

We have no forward line but North have a midfield and a good ruckman

How did May go in the VFL?

In Jones & Guelfi!!!

Out Redman & Sharp

We gotta improve our forward 50.

Bin Perkins and Langford and bring in Jones and Gresham/Guelfi.