And the US still has summer to look forward to.
And that would be absolute best case scenario here in Australia. Realistically, probably closer to 20.
Dutton has conceded the SNR fallacy anyway: now he wants big ones instead. Which are still being quoted as 10-15 years away, if we started now.
That would still be completed before Snowy Hydro 2.0 
Giggle⌠& all the IPCC predictions (âdartsâ ) are bullseyes.
I wonder if their climate models include gravity & solar cycles? Answer of course is NO. The question then must be how accurate are their climate models?
If that must be the question whatâs your answer genius? Youâre the one disparaging them and referencing super specific concepts like âgravityâ, so show us all how brilliantly you can tear down these models. Come on, donât squib it, donât be a coward again, donât hide behind another crackpot on youtube.
Covid and the China/US feud killed off Gatesâ experimental nuclear reactor testing didnât they?
LOL
How about you tell me why what Dilley states is wrong. Your attacking me, try attacking Dilleys statements.
Remember, if there is no CO2 control kn0b there is no gravy train for lots of people, the IPCC ceases to exist, and the radical Green movement people haters will need to find some other cause to force humanity to eat bugs, & eventually just die
Not watching your videos, do your own defence chum
So the electricity I assume all comes from wind & solar I guess.
I think there needs to be a lot more of both before that claim can be verified âŚ. lots and lots more. So am thinking that graph does not accurately reflect the real world much like climate models
Youâre complaining about todayâs status when the picture will be different in 5, 10, 15 years. Over the life of an EV the energy mix will drastically change. Coal will be gone in about 10 years, but the EV will still be driving around.
https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/features/202001_accuracy/
Looks fine to me.
Edit - wtf junk pseudoscience are you absorbing that links gravity to climate changeâŚ? Like⌠thatâs so stupid.
If solar cycles had an impact we wouldnât be seeing atmospheric cooling during peak solar activity. You should read up about on it. You might learn something.
Stop being a dikkhead. I could probably find all the research and figures that were used to compile this graph, but what would be the point, as you would deny.
It looks logical to me.
If I use my own experience then the ongoing charging of my EV is nearly 100% from the panels on my roof. Not sure what more real world you can get than that, and everyone I know charges in a similar way. Of course there are many who use the grid but as renewables now accounts for more and more of our electricity these graphs do make sense.
The article actually broke down amounts of recharging from renewables v fossil fuels. So no CO2 emissions from recharging in TAS (100% renewables) but even in high fossil fuel States emissions were MUCH lower than from ICE cars.
It seems '1408 did not bother to read the article.
Are there any stats on the fossil fuels used to produce renewable power, through solar hydro and wind equipment to the EV itself , set against the non use of fossil fuels in the end product?