Andrews puffing the chest over AZ use in Victoria.
Went for 0, didnât get within cooee of it, now to whatâs the best we can handle.
Not having a bar of that
Itâs safe, itâs effective.
Get it!
2.6M doses of it delivered in Vic.
the gladiator got it.
Dan says wonât be threshold step that guarantees more hospitalisation.
I know this is a humorous response to my post, with attached facts, but in the current environment, it might actually need a disclaimerâŚ
Dan Andrews peer pressuring people to get AZ haha.
Theyâre going to cancel the guns and roses tour hey?
I think this is the realistic approach to take. Itâs not a free for all, which is why âthe best we can handleâ makes sense. Itâs a careful balance between restrictions and hospitalisations. Itâs finding the right tolerances for living with covid as an ongoing disease.
and
You just crossed a line
The case for optimism for the Victorian outbreak:
Depending on the true effect of vaccines and continued uptake, the worst case scenario under this model is that we peak at <300 cases in early October and it quickly comes down after that.
Best case scenario is that weâve already hit our peak.
This projection bounces around a lot depending on case numbers, but it suggests slowing the speed of the outbreak has helped us avoid much bigger impacts.
Theyâve lost the plot.
basically choice less now. Compliance plummeting and significant contributing factor to ongoing transmission. Holding the line at the current levels is not only going to not reduce transmission, itâs gonna drive more people to non-compliance. People have given up.
PIN THE TAIL ON THE DONKEY FOR 9/9!
Waaaaaaaaait⌠did they choose an a.s.s for that game deliberately? If so, I am sloooooooooooow.
Australia broadly has always referred to suppression, NZ refers to elimination
For Vics, eliminating is the ideal, not necessarily achievable in current circumstances