Sutton said most deaths in aged care are not linked to an infection. One third to one quarter of Covid positive aged care will die.
Discounts the simple category of dying with, because of, calls for compassion.
On the difficulties in lay people understanding the death number reporting, i was waiting for one of them to say “Isn’t that your job as a journo?”
I still don’t understand what’s happened.
If there is a report that clears it up, can someone post it.
What are these new death guidelines and how have they changed from previously.
I don’t want to use it as a blame game. Just want to know what’s changed.
It’s more if you have a sniffle, then if you do get tested and by chance you had light symptoms of Covid, we can shut it down faster before you spread it too far.
No test means we won’t know until there could be 10 / 20 cases.
Kind of makes sense but people without a sniffle still may have it. Wouldn’t targeted testing be a better way of shutting it down rather than calling for people to go and get tested?
Encouraging people to get tested if they have a sniffle is basically a strategy for finding cases in the community that might have slipped under the radar, and then ruthlessly target-testing everyone associated before they can become a new locus.
The Victorian health system hs never been over-run or close to being over-run - They have 1200 beds in ICU with the most being used at 60 - Currently there are 26 in ICU.
High risk workplaces I would have thought.
E.g. effectively mandate testing for aged care workers by making it a condition of employment under Worksafe.