Cricket Part III

Hardly surprising but the CA Directors (well the remaining ones) have unanimously voted to keep the full bans in place for Bancroft, Smith and Warner. Personally I think they should have allowed Warner and Smith to play the back end of the Shield season. Would have been great for state cricket.

Also interestingly it looks like Pakistan are open to moving the ODI series scheduled for March (just before Smith and Warner’s bans end) to April. This would allow them to play a series of ODIs before the World Cup squad is selected in late April. There is also a chance some of these 5 games will be played in Pakistan.

Bans stand for suspended players

Unanimous decision from Cricket Australia Board means bans for Steve Smith, David Warner and Cameron Bancroft will remain

Andrew Ramsey

20 November 2018, 04:30 PM

Steve Smith and David Warner will not return to top-level cricket until the current home summer is completed after the Cricket Australia Board unanimously agreed not to alter penalties imposed over the ball-tampering incident.

CA’s Board met yesterday to consider a submission lodged by the Australian Cricketers’ Association on behalf of the banned pair and their teammate Cameron Bancroft, which called for the suspension to be immediately lifted and the three players be allowed to resume their careers.

The ACA cited findings in the recently released Ethics Centre review that drew links between CA’s corporate culture and the ‘win without counting the cost’ mindset of the Australia men’s team as “new evidence” that was sufficient to see the penalties set aside.

However, after a telephone hook-up of CA Board members during which the union’s submission was considered in detail and discussed at length, it was decided that the sanctions that were imposed by the board, and accepted by all three players, last March should stand.

Aussie trio banned as full details emerge

Interim Chair Earl Eddings said in a statement that the ACA’s submission - which the union has confirmed was lodged with the knowledge, but not at the behest of, the three players – placed unnecessary extra scrutiny on the banned trio.

He also announced that no further calls for the penalties to be altered will be considered by the Board.

“The Cricket Australia Board has carefully considered all elements of the ACA submission and has determined that it is not appropriate to make any changes to the sanctions handed down to the three players,” Eddings said today.

"Despite the absence of any recommendation regarding the sanctions in the recently released Ethics Centre Review, the Board has deliberated on the ACA’s submission at length. "We have reconsidered the sanctions as they apply to each of Steve, David and Cameron in light of the ACA’s submission and the Ethics Centre Review and Recommendations.

"The original decision of the Board to sanction the players was determined after rigorous discussion and consideration.

"CA maintains that both the length and nature of the sanctions remain an appropriate response in light of the considerable impact on the reputation of Australian cricket, here and abroad.

"Steve, David and Cameron are working hard to demonstrate their commitment to cricket and have our continued support to ensure their pathway to return is as smooth as possible.

"We believe the ongoing conversation about reducing the sanctions puts undue pressure on the three players – all of whom accepted the sanctions earlier this year - and the Australian men’s cricket team.

"As such, the Cricket Australia Board does not intend to consider further calls for amendments to the sanctions.

"Though we recognise that this decision will be disappointing for the ACA, we thank them for their submission.

“Our commitment to continue building a strong relationship between CA and the ACA in the interests of cricket in Australia remains and we look forward to meeting with them shortly to that end.”

Smith, Warner meet in Sydney

In calling for the bans - that were imposed under CA’s Code of Conduct after the ICC had announced penalties for Smith and Bancroft - to be lifted, the ACA indicated it would be “relentless” in its campaign to have the three players immediately reinstated to all forms of cricket.

Among the 42 recommendations contained in the Ethics Centre Review (of which all but one was deemed by CA to be worthy of consideration or already in train) was that representatives from CA and the ACA meet within a month to help repair the two bodies’ fractious relationship.

That meeting is expected to take place in coming weeks.

Bancroft’s nine-month suspension will end in late December, meaning he could be selected for the Perth Scorchers’ KFC Big Bash League match against the Hobart Hurricanes on December 30.

Smith and Warner’s bans were for 12 months respectively, which means they will not be available for selection for Australia, New South Wales or their BBL outfits until March 30.

Which is two days after the JLT Sheffield Shield Final – this Australian summer’s final scheduled match – begins.

The three players were charged, and found to be in breach of Article 2.3.5 of the CA Code of Conduct in that their conduct during the third Test against South Africa last March, when sandpaper was taken on to the field with the intent of altering condition of the ball:

• was contrary to the spirit of the game; • was unbecoming of a representative or official; • is or could be harmful to the interests of cricket; • and/or did bring the game of cricket into disrepute

After the Board announced the 12-month bans for Smith and Warner (as well as restrictions on the pair’s future eligibility for future team leadership roles) and nine months for Bancroft, the trio were afforded the opportunity to appeal the penalties and put their case to an independent commissioner.

However, they waived their right to engage in that process and agreed to accept the punishments as handed down by the Board.

In the wake of the independent review of CA’s culture conducted by the Ethics Centre and released publicly last month, then CA Chairman David Peever has stood down from the Board along with former Australia captain Mark Taylor who was the longest-serving CA Director.

In addition, Executive General Managers of Team Performance (Pat Howard) and Broadcasting, Digital Media and Commercial (Ben Amarfio) have departed CA in recent weeks resulting in an executive restructure under newly installed Chief Executive, Kevin Roberts.

Vics halfway there. 2-138.

It’d be a decided advantage for NSW if Smith and Warner were permitted to play Shield, but it’d be good experience for Shield bowlers.

As you point out it would be great for opposition bowlers, but just playing with and against players with the experience of Smith and Warner would be great for not only teammates but also opponents. It’s also something our cricket system is crying out for.

I don’t get the whole unfair advantage thing. It’s all swings and roundabouts. You could equally argue that their suspension is costing other state teams given for example Victoria will most likely be without Finch - something which may not have happened if the bans weren’t handed down. Fair play I say to NSW for having developed and retained these quality players.

1 Like

VICS 4-159, trail by 116 runs.
Harris and White out.
Short and Gotch in.

I didn’t agree with the bans the trio got, but it would look extremely weak by CA if they caved into public pressure and lifted or reduced the sanctions.

Doolan’s formline in the SS this season:

115, 10 v QLD
76, 6 v WA
53, 90 v NSW
0, 94 v VIC

444 runs at 55.5

3 Likes

4-187
VICS trail by 88 runs

Short and Gotch still in

edit: and that’s TEA.

1 Like

Interesting situation for the Vics

1 session and 6 wickets to make 88
It’s doable, given how straight the pitch seems to be playing and Tassie’s lack of a front line spinner, but they’re rocking a pretty long tail (Pattinson/Siddle/Trem/Boland/Holland).
They’re in strife if they lose Short and Gotch quickly.

shrugs
I was thinking entirely the opposite.
‘We’ve turned over our whole administration and to signify our new, fresh approach we’re going to…’ checks notes, sotto voce, ‘…really? No change at all?’
‘…ahem…How about that 20/20!’

1 Like

Looking “extremely weak” would be a significant step up for CA right now.

Just realised that S.Marsh has been playing first class cricket since 2000 - So after 18 long years the selectors are undecided over whether he he is a bona-fide test player.

2 Likes

VICS still 4 down and now trail by 63 runs

Pattinson is lower middle order, not tail.

Vics 25 behind 4 down
50s to both short and gotch

Channel 7 obviously no influence yet on cricket Australia like they do with the afl. It would be their ideal to have the players back this summer, particularly for the sri Lanka tests

1 Like

Vics win

1 Like

25 runs in ten minutes?
They were in a hurry.

Finished it with a 4 and a 6

He’s on that line of very good number 8, not quite middle order. IMO.
Cummins is in the same boat.

2 Likes

I don’t know which is more fragile, Patto’s body or our middle order.

Perhaps James should focus on his batting and become the All rounder we’ve been searching for.

1 Like