I’m gonna have to assume you didn’t see it then, because they did not lift their heads and swing.
They couldn’t get the bat near the ball.
I really think T20 is more your bag.
Feet down.
On their throats.
1 Like
It just looks like the sort of pitch where you have to take advantage at the opportunities.
But I maintain that at least some members here are complete fools talking about both football and cricket.
No points for guessing who the worst two offenders are.
1 Like
If India get 287 on this wicket they deserve to win.
2 Likes
We can but hope.
Hope we don’t bowl too short and wide.
Yep. Will be a huge effort.
If their still batting come the second new ball they will probably still need between 50-80 runs so they will need batsmen at the crease with their tail.
WOOOOOOOO
Onya bike son
'Scot him. 'scaaaaawn!!
GAME ON BITCHEZ!
Handy start
That’s ■■■■■■ his average.
1 Like
Nice cut there Mitch,. beee yooo tee full
And in other news, Latham carried his bat for 268.
Sri Lanka 3-20 in their second dig.
Prime Ministers XI ??
Worse. Sheep-■■■■■■■.
2 Likes
And Pujara cops one on the Mal Meningas, the Manly Warringahs and the Onka Paringas.
No need to be a w*nker for no reason was there? that’s more the kind of thing you’d see in a Worsfold thread, so maybe stick that nonsense to that one unless a opposite opinion really riles you up so easily?
I’m going to assume you’re blind as the bat clearly connected with ball as both Starc and Hazlewood hit 36 runs off 8 overs, which suggests they did infact connect bat with ball. Hazlewood’s foot movement consisted of jumping at the short one and swinging.