Annoying that the bloke that has put a real price on his wicket has twice copped shooters off the pitch.
Lucky man is hazelwood, would of been his 4th first innings duck of the series
Josh âDiggerâ Hazlewood.
Should have got two runs out of itâŚ
It used to be so frustrating when guys would sweep and be protected from LBW because you canât guarantee where the ball would go.
Decent rule change in my book. I wish it had been in force when I played.
1 Like
I canât agree.
You canât possibly know how the ball will spin so if you have to assume anything you should assume that it wonât spin at all.
Assuming it will turn square is silly, imo, but thatâs the rule.
Reverse the order for the lols if we bat again. Hazlewood batting better than the top 5.
No wonder our bowlers are cooked. Have to take wickets and score runs.
I think they had a stat that said Cummins has had to bowl or bat on every day this series.
3 Likes
I wouldnât be surprised if a half dozen players this series (from both sides) share that honour
Starc and Hazelwood would probably prefer if Australia were forced to follow on.
These two may as well just stay out there if we have to follow-on.
We may yet achieve half their total, âŚ
BURN THE WITCH!
(subject to DRS)
1 Like
BoooooooooooooooâŚ
lol that wasnât hitting the wicket, even by a millimeter
Iâm never happy with an LB given when you can see two stumps.
300 better than I thought we would get
now if we can get a 100 from one of the top 6 and couple of 50+'s then we could get more than 322
Hoping for some of this from Marnus âVVSâ Labuschagne:
1 Like