Should this be a poll?
l disagree with your assertion.
Also, subsequent events completely validated Reimers speaking out.
But it isnât a non issue. Especially in the context provided both in the article and in various posts here.
Most of us are lucky enough to not understand why a condescending âjokeâ from and old, white, male, domineering â â â â could cause such offence. But it can. And it did. But rather than ask why the offended party feels that way we just say they shouldnât, even when it is very, very clear the environment Kennet oversaw was â â â â â â â disgusting. Weâre happy to just put the onus back on the Riolis to deal with it and shut up.
Even the fact that their reaction to the jeans joke is the main topic of discussion here when other, more horrendous issues are evident says something. Why the hell does it matter that the article is âpoorly constructedâ? Yet that is being clung to as a way of minimising how the Riolis felt.
âWhite privilegeâ isnât an insult. It doesnât make you racist or a bad person. You donât choose to have it. But it affects your ability to understand other peopleâs feelings and people should be â â â â â â â aware of it.
I donât even know why they included the pants story.
It derailed the article.
Did you read beyond the ripped jeans part?
- No
0 voters
yep
All I can say is that this incident has torn the fabric of the Hawthorn Football Club.
I read the entire article.
Any guesses who made the comment? Iâm gonna put MItchellâs name out there because he is a known â â â â
Iâm sorry, but the Polls donât lie. 100% of people did not read the article.
So you are calling me a liar.
OK, I struggled through that article. The real issue was that the club did not deal with the senior player making a unacceptable remark. In Caroline Wilson fashion, the article has a target âJeff Kennettâ, but it seems to me that her target is chosen because of Wilsonâs disdain towards the man and not because he was actually responsible for what occurred. I can tell you now that Kennett writing a letter of apology for an innocent joke is far more than I would have done.
In relation to the actual incident, well sure Kennett is an official at the club, but was he the only official at the club that should be targeted? Then there were the requests that were ignored. Again, AFL clubs are a business and clearly they chose to invest their money elsewhereâŚlike winning premierships. I would think nearly every other club would have done the same thing back in 2012.
It might seem that I an defending Kennett, but I am more against anything Wilson writes because of the way she attacked Hird, Thompson and the Club during the saga. She is all about click bait. Iâm sure that every club has had incidents similar to this in the past and probably dealt with it in house. Iâm sure Wilson would have loved to drag the Senior Hawks players name through the mud, but the club did not allow it. Hopefully the club did reprimand and educate that player in some way though.
Iâm sure I have come across as insensitive, but if we are going to bring up the past, why stop at 2012 and not go back and name and shame football people from the 50âs, 60âs, 70âs, 80âs and 90âs? What are we going to achieve? I donât and will never understand how people can get upset by harmless jokes like the one about the jeans, and if people to choose to be offended, then unfortunately thatâs on them!
Yep, people like you will never get it. What is harmless to you may be deeply hurtful and bring utter mental anguish to others.
You should change your blitz name as you disrespect James Hird.
That was my test for you. Now I do not give a fark what people say about me, but I am old and my skin is very thick.
Now you may have been hurt at my bagging your character. Maybe that is how a young indigneous woman felt when an old white bloke made a tasteless joke at her expense.
Just because it doesnât hurt you doesnât mean it will not hurt someone else.
So at what point does it become the individuals problem to deal with, rather than everyone elseâs?
People can get offended about absolutely anything if they choose to, how are you to know?
You already know the aanswer to that.
From all the stories you have told on here, I find it laughable that you constantly try to take the morale high ground on any subject.
Correct, so if a person attempts to apologize and you choose not to accept it, then what more can the person do?
fark hawthorn
Calling something âwokeâ or âPCâ is a good way to totally deny perfectly valid concerns. Just putting yourself in the shoes of the other person would be a good way to start. Sometimes years of âjokesâ and âI was just hanging â â â â on ya!â have a tendency to build up. One canât predict what will ultimately be the tipping point.
Speaking from experience.