We should delist Dylan Van Unen and maybe a Nick O’Brien?
We should delist Dylan Van Unen and maybe a Nick O'Brien?
NOB is contracted for next year
Unfortunately that's irrelevant.
We should delist Dylan Van Unen and maybe a Nick O'Brien?
NOB is contracted for next year
At least one player that is contracted next year needs to be delisted or demoted to the rookie list.
We still need to free up two spots so it's assumed DVU will free one spot then one of Pears, Dalgliesh, O'Brien or even Kavanagh may go onto the rookie list.
It also means there may not be enough room for both Steinburg and Dell'Olio as well.
Dells at the end of his 3 years, so probably delisted.
Isnt stein too?
Unfortunately that's irrelevant.
We should delist Dylan Van Unen and maybe a Nick O'Brien?
NOB is contracted for next year
At least one player that is contracted next year needs to be delisted or demoted to the rookie list.
We still need to free up two spots so it's assumed DVU will free one spot then one of Pears, Dalgliesh, O'Brien or even Kavanagh may go onto the rookie list.
It also means there may not be enough room for both Steinburg and Dell'Olio as well.
Dells at the end of his 3 years, so probably delisted.
that's not even close to funny Barnz
Unfortunately that's irrelevant.
We should delist Dylan Van Unen and maybe a Nick O'Brien?
NOB is contracted for next year
At least one player that is contracted next year needs to be delisted or demoted to the rookie list.
We still need to free up two spots so it's assumed DVU will free one spot then one of Pears, Dalgliesh, O'Brien or even Kavanagh may go onto the rookie list.
It also means there may not be enough room for both Steinburg and Dell'Olio as well.
Dells at the end of his 3 years, so probably delisted.
that's not even close to funny Barnz
huh?
Stein only on rookie list for two years. Eligible for another year I think.
Unfortunately that's irrelevant.
We should delist Dylan Van Unen and maybe a Nick O'Brien?
NOB is contracted for next year
At least one player that is contracted next year needs to be delisted or demoted to the rookie list.
We still need to free up two spots so it's assumed DVU will free one spot then one of Pears, Dalgliesh, O'Brien or even Kavanagh may go onto the rookie list.
It also means there may not be enough room for both Steinburg and Dell'Olio as well.
Of those I'd probably demote Dalgliesh before Kav. But you'd imagine Pears before Dalgliesh too
I’m astounded PEETO is still on the list.
Pears onto rookie list.
Edit-Just my thoughts
Dell -isted.
Kav to rookie list for mine.
Any views on Thurlow as a rookie? I saw him in a televised practice match and looked a prospect, but that was it.
For all those suggesting that Kav should be demoted to the rookie list, consider this. First you have to delist him. He's then a free agent. Which means Sydney (or anyone) can then pick him up for free onto their senior list before the rookie draft.I'm guessing they might delist Kav and re-rookie him as he has another year on his contract still to run.
If he was out of contract he would be gonski.
Now, maybe Sydney doesn't want to as they couldn't trade anyone out. Maybe nobody else wants to even if he comes for free. And maybe we wouldn't care since we don't think he'll make it or have any trade value a year from now.
But it is something we would need to consider.
Of course, the same right to pick up delisted players as free agents applies to anyone delisted as part of moving them to the rookie list.
Two more.Havent we already got rid of Jetta. Hardingham, Gregory, and Ryder?
And gained Cooney, Giles, Ambrose, #17 and #20.
Thus we need to lose one more.
TWO!!!! more.to have the 3 list spots available to draft 2 kids(pick 17 & 20) and upgrade Ambrose.why do we need to delist more players?
need to delist 1 more off the main list.
For all those suggesting that Kav should be demoted to the rookie list, consider this. First you have to delist him. He's then a free agent. Which means Sydney (or anyone) can then pick him up for free onto their senior list before the rookie draft.I'm guessing they might delist Kav and re-rookie him as he has another year on his contract still to run.
If he was out of contract he would be gonski.
Now, maybe Sydney doesn't want to as they couldn't trade anyone out. Maybe nobody else wants to even if he comes for free. And maybe we wouldn't care since we don't think he'll make it or have any trade value a year from now.
But it is something we would need to consider.
Of course, the same right to pick up delisted players as free agents applies to anyone delisted as part of moving them to the rookie list.
Clubs have a gentlemen's agreement not to touch players who are transferred from the Primary List to the Rookie List - Can you give me a name to support your argument.
if only someone could tell us how many delistings are needed and whether or not we need to delist contracted players. *sigh*
I think Dalgleigh should go back to the stupidly named Rookie List, certainly ahead of Pears and Kavanagh.
Dalgleish showed more in his senior games than Kav has.
For players that they would only put onto the rookie draft - sure. Especially if the player wants to stay at their club.Clubs have a gentlemen's agreement not to touch players who are transferred from the Primary List to the Rookie List - Can you give me a name to support your argument.For all those suggesting that Kav should be demoted to the rookie list, consider this. First you have to delist him. He's then a free agent. Which means Sydney (or anyone) can then pick him up for free onto their senior list before the rookie draft.I'm guessing they might delist Kav and re-rookie him as he has another year on his contract still to run.
If he was out of contract he would be gonski.
Now, maybe Sydney doesn't want to as they couldn't trade anyone out. Maybe nobody else wants to even if he comes for free. And maybe we wouldn't care since we don't think he'll make it or have any trade value a year from now.
But it is something we would need to consider.
Of course, the same right to pick up delisted players as free agents applies to anyone delisted as part of moving them to the rookie list.
But I suspect it would be a whole different kettle of fish if another club was offering a senior list spot and the player wanted to take it. It's one thing to let another club put someone on their own rookie list when you're not offering anything significantly more and forcing the player to uproot themselves. Its another when you're offering the security of the main list, and the player has to agree to it (and presumably want it).
Dalgleish showed more in his senior games than Kav has.
The only way Dalgleish will lose his senior list spot is because of a negative long term medical prognosis.
For all those suggesting that Kav should be demoted to the rookie list, consider this. First you have to delist him. He's then a free agent. Which means Sydney (or anyone) can then pick him up for free onto their senior list before the rookie draft.I'm guessing they might delist Kav and re-rookie him as he has another year on his contract still to run.
If he was out of contract he would be gonski.
Now, maybe Sydney doesn't want to as they couldn't trade anyone out. Maybe nobody else wants to even if he comes for free. And maybe we wouldn't care since we don't think he'll make it or have any trade value a year from now.
But it is something we would need to consider.
Of course, the same right to pick up delisted players as free agents applies to anyone delisted as part of moving them to the rookie list.
When you consider Kav flagged his intention to find a new home before the trade period, and there were no takers, I think it's pretty safe bet that we could delist him and re-rookie him if that's what our intention was. This is a guy who could crack the top 10 of our reserves B&F. Other clubs aren't going to be banging down his door, least of all Sydney.