the last bit is at odds with what they did
Especially ANY high contact on Geelong players.
Would hate to be the club playing them this week!
AwFL hoping to get invited by FIFA and IOC to join them in the “ASSOciation of most corrupt sporting associations and LeaguES”
You can’t keep calling the player a moron if you’re attacking the mob that let him play with head damage. Was he a moron before he got knocked out or after?
Ha, we beat Essendon with the bad week we’ve had publicity wise. Next.
Clubs will do sweet FA.
Geelong should get pick 7 for all the trouble sweeping this under the rug today.
whately wasnt impressed initially wonder how he was on afl 360
edit: hes not happy with afl statement.
https://x.com/aflnation/status/2085292380731974020?s=46
Again, why was the waiver required / offered / asked for? The fact that this thing exists is absolutely damning on the club , player or both.
Yes, it’s a complex issue. That doesn’t alter the fact that the AFL already has procedures to be followed…
Governance, anyone?
I’m not sure this is an accurate assessment.
Geelong have not negotiated any arrangement outside of the protocols - the protocols that are in place now to ensure player safety around concussion. I am sure geelong would have acted within those protocols for each individual player whilst still at the club.
What they have negotiated is an indemnity from any future laibility that arises in the future as a result of concussion from footy.
It is different.
But still wrong and they should be held to account.
Nothing will happen. Story will be buried. The usual media lapdogs tomorrow will all be trotting out the same talking points to try and kill it. You watch.
There’s some interesting movements of personnel between that club and various positions of influence within the AFL over time…
This.
I don’t have an issue with players / clubs signing away the risk with eyes open but what about the players who were forcibly retired who weren’t afforded this option
Madness these farks just get away with it every time
Because then that would involve punishing Geelong, and we all know thats a nig no no
Well apparently now it’s only one club. Sweepy, sweepy.
remember, this is the club that won premierships with the very substance that caused our club 20 years of pain, no one has ever said anything or questioned geelong over it, this is how it works
Something outside the protocols triggered them to make the waiver clause. Something made Geelong think it was needed. What was it? That’s the question.
I just want James to apologise and take some accountability for his actions.
It’s not a waiver. You can’t strike a contract which has the effect of you waiving your legal obligations.
well actually I guess you can, but would never hold up in a court
