Geelong exist outside OHS laws and AFL rules, and that’s OK

the last bit is at odds with what they did

3 Likes

Especially ANY high contact on Geelong players.

Would hate to be the club playing them this week!

2 Likes

AwFL hoping to get invited by FIFA and IOC to join them in the “ASSOciation of most corrupt sporting associations and LeaguES”

2 Likes

You can’t keep calling the player a moron if you’re attacking the mob that let him play with head damage. Was he a moron before he got knocked out or after?

1 Like

Ha, we beat Essendon with the bad week we’ve had publicity wise. Next.

Clubs will do sweet FA.

4 Likes

Geelong should get pick 7 for all the trouble sweeping this under the rug today.

1 Like

whately wasnt impressed initially wonder how he was on afl 360

edit: hes not happy with afl statement.
https://x.com/aflnation/status/2085292380731974020?s=46

1 Like

Again, why was the waiver required / offered / asked for? The fact that this thing exists is absolutely damning on the club , player or both.

Yes, it’s a complex issue. That doesn’t alter the fact that the AFL already has procedures to be followed…

Governance, anyone?

12 Likes

I’m not sure this is an accurate assessment.

Geelong have not negotiated any arrangement outside of the protocols - the protocols that are in place now to ensure player safety around concussion. I am sure geelong would have acted within those protocols for each individual player whilst still at the club.

What they have negotiated is an indemnity from any future laibility that arises in the future as a result of concussion from footy.

It is different.

But still wrong and they should be held to account.

1 Like

Nothing will happen. Story will be buried. The usual media lapdogs tomorrow will all be trotting out the same talking points to try and kill it. You watch.

2 Likes

There’s some interesting movements of personnel between that club and various positions of influence within the AFL over time…

5 Likes

This.

I don’t have an issue with players / clubs signing away the risk with eyes open but what about the players who were forcibly retired who weren’t afforded this option

Madness these farks just get away with it every time

5 Likes

Because then that would involve punishing Geelong, and we all know thats a nig no no

1 Like

Well apparently now it’s only one club. Sweepy, sweepy.

1 Like

remember, this is the club that won premierships with the very substance that caused our club 20 years of pain, no one has ever said anything or questioned geelong over it, this is how it works

6 Likes

Something outside the protocols triggered them to make the waiver clause. Something made Geelong think it was needed. What was it? That’s the question.

3 Likes

I just want James to apologise and take some accountability for his actions.

3 Likes

It’s not a waiver. You can’t strike a contract which has the effect of you waiving your legal obligations.

well actually I guess you can, but would never hold up in a court