A 44-year-old woman has been fined almost $2,000 after she tried to insert a bag of methylamphetamine into her dog’s ■■■■.
Thanks for the service to slow learners, stating the same thing three times in one post. 
1 Like
Bruce Lehrmann really gets around
2 Likes
“high profile” so can’t be named. The average “Joe Blow” doesn’t get that luxury.
2 Likes
Nope I’m guessing a court order from the families KC.
1 Like
My family doesn’t even have a GP
What about a SFA?
Wasn’t there a prominent legal or political or business figure a year or two back who has a veeeeery long suppression order on his name (decades long) after he was caught writing abuse fantasies about kids online? ORder was granted because he was apparently under stress when he wrote it, and revealing his identity could cause embarrassment.
The rich live under different rules.
4 Likes
Ha! Bloody luxury!
I was in the NT in June. Travelled from Uluṟu, to Alice Springs, Kakadu and Darwin.
I find the situation with the indigenous population eye opening. Especially in Katherine.
I really hope things improve.
1 Like
If it’s the case I’m thinking of it might involve a well known sporting family connected to a high profile sport
Careful. You may as well have just come and blurted their names out.
Hard to see it will.
It’s doubt it’s due to a lack of taxmoney or I assume people going out there wanting to do the right thing.
Be hard living out on the country in remote communities. I’d struggle.
lol sure, we only one have family and one sport in Aus
1 Like
If it is the same case, the fact whoever this is has some link to an AFL club is public knowledge.
same case
sporting references though have been historically scrubbed - likely because he was being identified, thus undermining the suppression order
Exactly. Many sports, many sporting families in Australia.
Not the Mitchell’s, they seemed to have such good values and Mrs Mitchell’s home cooked meals. You can’t trust anyone these days.
2 Likes
12 Likes