Breaking my golden rule next year.
Going to boo a player for the first time
Ever
Thisâll be the second Ryder to break my heart. I still regret getting that âWinona Foreverâ tattoo.
Go easy on Paddy, he is sick to death of the tabloids in Melbourne and wants out, I can get that. This is a negotiation, we have a legally binding contract , no manager is going to drag his player through the courts. He stays or we get a good deal. Have some faith in Dodoro, in times like these its good to have a stubborn, arrogant prick on your side.
WinoThis'll be the second Ryder to break my heart. I still regret getting that "Winona Forever" tattoo.
Go easy on Paddy, he is sick to death of the tabloids in Melbourne and wants out, I can get that. This is a negotiation, we have a legally binding contract , no manager is going to drag his player through the courts. He stays or we get a good deal. Have some faith in Dodoro, in times like these its good to have a stubborn, arrogant prick on your side.
So radelaide is the place to avoid fishbowls?
Port are now alluding to the deal involving Pick #16 and a "mid range" player. Well judging on that, I would say someone like Polec, Harlett, Pittard or a Broadbent would fall into that category.
Â
Now that we know Ryder is going to Port - lets move on. Reluctantly accept this is probably going to be best case, and think what "mid range" player would suit.
Â
Given that you'd have to say Boak, Wingard, Gray, Schultz, Trengove, Westhoff, Wines, Lobbe, Carlile and Monfries would be off the table as far as Hinkley is concerned, and Cornes and Ebert are too old for us to accept. I'm hoping its perhaps one of the four I mentioned at the top.
If this goes to court I'm done.
What would you have us do if we are offered unders. What would you consider unders?
Why donât we trade him to Port for all of their listed ruckmen? We can sit back and watch Paddy get run into the ground and give up the game through exhaustion. A deliciously evil plan.
Cue maniacal laughter
This is fkn bullshit.
All because ASADA and the AFL have been on a long winded fkn witch hunt thatâs taken itâs toll.
Losing Paddy a vital component in our push for a flag over next few years to a very strong competitor can be something else we seek damages over.
On similar money to our contract offer. When will it get out how much the AFL are paying him to be an ambassador!.. Fkn fkn fark
Hartlett is better than midrange and Polec is a gun
Â
and Cornes and Ebert are too old for us to accept. I'm hoping its perhaps one of the four I mentioned at the top.
Ebert at the ripe old age of 24 ?????
Port are now alluding to the deal involving Pick #16 and a "mid range" player. Well judging on that, I would say someone like Polec, Harlett, Pittard or a Broadbent would fall into that category.
Â
Now that we know Ryder is going to Port - lets move on. Reluctantly accept this is probably going to be best case, and think what "mid range" player would suit.
Â
Given that you'd have to say Boak, Wingard, Gray, Schultz, Trengove, Westhoff, Wines, Lobbe, Carlile and Monfries would be off the table as far as Hinkley is concerned, and Cornes and Ebert are too old for us to accept. I'm hoping its perhaps one of the four I mentioned at the top.
Or can just say â â â â off and refuse to trade him.
We must not roll over on this deal. It is imperative for our membership and future going forward.
DO NOT ROLL OVER!!!
Polec wonât leave, was homesick pre moving to Port.
Paddy actually said...? and where?Paddy said on 7 that the reason he's nominated port is because there on brink of success and a premiership and that's what you play footy for. fark me patty if that's the case why did you go to Brisbane and gws for .paddy maybe we have been **** ,because we've recruited to many blokes who only think about themselves and are not team people.
Walking out of the airport on 7 news ,someone will have a feed of it. After watching him speak doesn't seem the brightest spark on the planet, looks likes a bloke that needs a bit of quality guidance
Fark PaddyÂ
Fark CarltonÂ
Fark KochÂ
Port are now alluding to the deal involving Pick #16 and a "mid range" player. Well judging on that, I would say someone like Polec, Harlett, Pittard or a Broadbent would fall into that category.
Â
Now that we know Ryder is going to Port - lets move on. Reluctantly accept this is probably going to be best case, and think what "mid range" player would suit.
Â
Given that you'd have to say Boak, Wingard, Gray, Schultz, Trengove, Westhoff, Wines, Lobbe, Carlile and Monfries would be off the table as far as Hinkley is concerned, and Cornes and Ebert are too old for us to accept. I'm hoping its perhaps one of the four I mentioned at the top.
Â
No. The best case is either Ryder staying or Port making us an offer we can't refuse. Paddy is contracted. We don't have to trade him unless it's worth it for us. Paddy nominating Port only means that he wants to go there-it doesn't mean that he's going there. Caddy nominated us a couple of years when he was contracted, and Ryan O'Keefe nominated Hawthorn and Carlton a few years ago. It's not just what we got for Paddy - it's also about the precedent. If we squib this, we'll be an easy target in the future.
Â
Â
Paddy actually said...? and where?Paddy said on 7 that the reason he's nominated port is because there on brink of success and a premiership and that's what you play footy for. fark me patty if that's the case why did you go to Brisbane and gws for .paddy maybe we have been **** ,because we've recruited to many blokes who only think about themselves and are not team people.
Walking out of the airport on 7 news ,someone will have a feed of it. After watching him speak doesn't seem the brightest spark on the planet, looks likes a bloke that needs a bit of quality guidanceÂ
Â
And he got Connors.
[quote name=âcindersâ post=â354172â timestamp=â1411731044â]According to Koch, Paddy Ryder (as well as being a quality player) is a âquality young blokeâ.
Iâd have thought his recent activities belied that description.[/quot
Quality and loyal blokes in my business donât rip up contracts.must be expectable at port
Port are now alluding to the deal involving Pick #16 and a "mid range" player. Well judging on that, I would say someone like Polec, Harlett, Pittard or a Broadbent would fall into that category.
Now that we know Ryder is going to Port - lets move on. Reluctantly accept this is probably going to be best case, and think what "mid range" player would suit.
Given that you'd have to say Boak, Wingard, Gray, Schultz, Trengove, Westhoff, Wines, Lobbe, Carlile and Monfries would be off the table as far as Hinkley is concerned, and Cornes and Ebert are too old for us to accept. I'm hoping its perhaps one of the four I mentioned at the top.
Polec and hartlett are very early draft picks and are not mid range players.....
Ports biggest problem is convincing someone half decent to be part of the deal, I don't think they want to do that and I don't think they will.
Short straws anyone???