Hannebery Vs Hurley - How Many, If Any?

Was our free kick, not a Sydney goal.

Free kick to hurley and nothing more imo

Should get 2. The fact that Hurls didn't even get a free for it was just blatant cheating. The only thing that might get it downgraded was the fact that Hurley played out the game.

If the umpires can pay a free to someone charging into an opponent with their head, they can pay a free to someone with their head over the ball trying to pick it up who gets hit high. Hannerbery had time to reposition as Hurley was tapping the ball along in front of him for 3-4 metres.There have been plenty of players in Hannerbery’s situation who have avoided contact.

Think you're overreacting here Soulnet. Both were going for the ball.

Agree. Nothing in it. 

A hit in the head is sacrosanct no?

 

FU AFL

They compared it to hodge and murphy a bump after the game, so he will get zilch.

Should get 2, will get 0

How would anyone really know what might happen. The maggots, the MRP and the Tribunal just roll a die on these incidents. In my opinion Hurley got to the ball first and bent over in an attempt to pick the ball up. Hannebury turned  his body and collected Hurley in the neck and head propelling him backwards. Should have been a free at least.

 

My understanding of the rule is that if a player has his head down to pick up the ball he is protected and if hit about the shoulders, especially the head he will receive a free for high contact. Depending on the force, intention and impact the aggressor will be cited by the MRP. If the player after taking possession of the ball chooses to lower his head to force his way through  and makes contact with an opposition player the call will be play on or if tackled correctly holding the ball. After tonight it seems that there is a different rule for swans players.

Hurley was bent over the ball trying to pick it up, Hanneberry turned his hip into Hurleys head. He could have killed him, and it was unnecessary.

Remember Neil Sachse

If Hurley had managed to get hold of the ball in any one of his 5 or six attempts at it, the bump would not even have happened!  

 

(He came back well in the second half and beat Buddy I reckon, and was all guts after two heavy knocks)

 

Hannebery won't go for this even though it seemed like he was aware Hurley was there since he was looking right at him.  Maybe a week if the MRP agree he saw Hurley, but they won't.

He looked directly at Hurley and decided to hit him, Hurley had eyes for the ball only. Should he be gone, YES. Will he? No.

https://twitter.com/harfserious/status/467271363074326528

Just in case you were unsure, it was all Hurley’s fault.

Well done Harf you waste of air. It was Hurleys fault for nearly being put in a wheelchair??

Hurley put his head over the ball. Hannebury saw him and put on a deliberate bump with zero concern for avoiding a hit to hurleys head

https://twitter.com/harfserious/status/467271363074326528
Just in case you were unsure, it was all Hurley's fault.

Wow; that‘s ■■■■■■-dom of a very high order. Maybe he could mention Mcveigh digging to China and being handed a goal for it.

Well done Harf you waste of air. It was Hurleys fault for nearly being put in a wheelchair??

 

to be fair Harf never won a hardball in his life so he has a different view of protecting oneself

Had some time to think on this…were it any other 2 clubs involved, and there was a suspension, I reckon we’d be crying “GayFL! Bring back the bump!! etc”

As it is, both players were going at it, Hannah didn’t attack with malice, but there most definitely should have been a free there…that they kicked on and exploited our one defender down for a goal was a disgrace. Hannah should not go, but the ump should. We were on a roll and the maggot found a way to stop us. Again.


Well done Harf you waste of air. It was Hurleys fault for nearly being put in a wheelchair??


to be fair Harf never won a hardball in his life so he has a different view of protecting oneself
although, if he knew much about self protection surely he wouldn't expose his analytical ability for public amusement

https://twitter.com/harfserious/status/467271363074326528Just in case you were unsure, it was all Hurley's fault.

Wow; that‘s ■■■■■■-dim of a very high order. Maybe he could mention Mcveigh digging to China and being handed a goal for it.

And if you thought that was good, Riccuito thought that Hurley went in 'dangerously low'.
Hurley had his eyes on the ball all the way and it's a bit hard to pick up the ball without bending over.
And why has there been no comment on all these players barging into stationary players with their heads to 'draw' a free? Very prevalent this year and the umpires get sucked in every time. Pity the poor ■■■■■■■ who is on the end of one of these head butts when the head butter gets seriously injured.