You are saying that Heppell and #21 don’t hold a important part in supporters’ hearts but GO’D and #10 do.
I’m saying that supporters’ under the age of 21 would have more connection to Heppell and #21 than GO’D and #10 and thus a social media video aimed at them makes sense.
I think that whatever narrative you want to push, there are plenty of examples to prove it and plenty of examples to prove the opposite.
I like the idea of reusing famous numbers but it doesn’t always work itself out, especially during an era where the club has not accomplished a whole lot.
Probably too far back for you (and a lot of other here) but Ken Fletcher (father of Dustin) wore number 21 for 264 Games, was captain 1977-1979 and won the B & F in 1978.
Would be safe to say that our captain for 6 years that just recently retired handing over his number to a young buck is a feel good story and does mean something to the fan base. I’m mid 30s and Gary ODonnell handing over #10 would mean nothing to me so you’re speaking for yourself here. No one else.
Think you’re missing the point completely. It’s not just about history. It’s about shared experience which is where passion for the club comes from.
Most under 35 won’t have a strong connection to players from the 80s and 90s because they didn’t live those shared experiences watching them play. The entire fan base would and should appreciate everything Heppell has done for this club and his service / number being handed down should be of significance.
100%, it’s very ironic that some in here believe that only our successful past is worth remembering and not the clubs servants of the past 20 years that were unfortunately drafted into a rubbish club and culture. Its very unfair.