Political Correctness

Flag my post then

How on earth do you come to that conclusion?
Ah. You’re thinking purely in terms of aggression?
The issue is you’re ascribing idiocy to a section of society, you’ve already said you wouldn’t do that to a gender or a race, now extend that to people with a muscular disorder.

No, it’s because it’s directed at an individual and is more likely to be taken personally.

I don’t think either of us is understanding the other then.

1 Like

Is the individual largely helpless to respond? Because that’s who you are targeting when you go labelling these groups of people as mere swear words.

Well, they shouldn’t.
‘Oh, I only mean it in this specific way’ is not an excuse for anyone.

1 Like

the C double o n word ?

does that make them racist ? or is it ok when black people call other black people that ?

So what are retarded people called now? My neighbour is 50 with the intellect of a 6 year old. Intellectually disabled doesn’t seem right, I don’t think of him as disabled.

Right of response? It helps, but surely we can agree things are worse when targeted at the individual. I suspect few, or possibly even none of the group would be exposed to the offending item unless highlighted.

Back up a touch. I hope you’re not suggesting that I think it’s ok to label the differently abled such a term.

He’s all three.
Literally.
Actually, retarded is far more accurate than dis-abled.
But no-one uses disabled as a slur, so…
I guess intellectually challenged is the milquetoast description.
And he’s certainly that.

Edit: come to think of it, intellectually doesn’t seem right either.
Developmentally challenged?

What? And deprive Blitz of the joy you bring? Never! :slight_smile:

https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/language-guide/words-to-describe-people-with-disability/

But that’s not related to using various words as a generic slur: essentially you are saying “you suck because you’re as bad as others with a [generally unavoidable] illness/injury”.

I appreciate the effort, but there’s a theme there, and it’s that none of the preferred descriptions are one word.

Referring to a differently abled person as ‘handicapable’ in a sincere way seems condescending.

Also, do people with paraplegia take offense to the term ‘paraplegic?’

Depends on if he’s disabled.

I hear a lot of people refer to people with ASD as Neural Diverse for example. I guess trying to frame any potential challenge in a positive way rather than having a negative catch all.

You have to assume that ‘people diagnosed with autism’ will be next.
And ‘on the spectrum’ will be looked down on.

That still doesn’t make it right to use those phrases as an insult. Don’t think I’m jumping onboard your bandwagon here.

My cousin has severe autism, and my aunty & uncle who do lots of work with autistic people, say he is ‘autistic’. I’m pretty sure that is the medical term for what he has.

You so are :slight_smile:

Very clear difference.

1 Like

These were all medical terms.

1 Like