Banned.
For me, the thing with these jumpers - many like the FC one are designed to view up close - which is, if you think about it, a shallow perspective. The nature of the piece is that it is worn on someone appearing small on a screen. Bold patterns that are visible would work much better. Otherwise, it looks like pink jumpers playing against powder blue jumpers.
FINISH THEM!
It looks like Geelong vs St Kilda.
Neither of them really considered how the shorts wouldn’t match the jumper, and the Sydney number patch is awful.
Sinclair isn’t too bad.
Why are you looking at other men’s trousers?
In the back, maggot.
KENNEDY!
Maybe should have gone for Sinclair instead of Luenberger.
Kurnow ya ring.
gotta say this rule is bullshit.
forwards can double hand shove defenders but they can’t in reverse. so defender grabs on and get pinged.
Yeah, … but they’re not produced with the TV viewers in mind.
Ump can tell the difference (and they look good to him Up Close 
)
… and they look good (up close, … Hopefully) for a BUYER to wear, … $$$$$$$
Cant see Carlton winning another game maybe GC or Brisbane? fck me it’s going to suck with us the only team loosing to Fck Carlton
Yes. Rubbish rule.
FRANKLIN!!!
Yeah, I guess.
Anyway, it’s all about me, so ■■■■ them.
1x week Carlton maggot.
he could jump over buddy you ■■■■■■■ mouth breathers.
Heeeeenge
Derp.
marks younger brother goes alright.