They pretty much changed every off field role at the club less than two years ago.
People in charge of the football club are completely different.
The ultimate mozz
You might (rightly) argue there’s no plan. But by plan I meant the current program / club Vozzo / Scott / MacPherson are trying to implement.
The media loves this kinda stuff
Talk us up for us to fail so hard and then shove the boots in extra hard
Yeah jokes aside they do
They rise us up to make the fall even more spectacular
What changes can he make? All of the deadwood is already signed up.
Tell him to name his price.
Double membership costs if that’s what it takes.
Maybe. But have they ever done a proper full on selection process? Complete with psych testing, interview scenarios, what ifs etc?
They certainly haven’t for the head coaches.
They just go through the motions and pick who they want.
And usually it seems they want someone for reasons other than their coaching ability.
Selection panels have been so unprofessional, leaked like sieves, annointed people prior to the process being finalised, leaked to the press and certainly not done sufficient references and vetting (Thornburn the case in point)
Yet we have a supposed high level hr expert on the board? It’s laughable.
Thats all good and all but can they spell Gatorade backwards?
And what is it? How is it different to what’s gone on before?
You’re all just being a bunch of resultists…
Focus on development with renewed resources and coaches. Restructuring of list management currently underway. Fixing fitness and conditioning. Rebuilding culture (AFL lifestyle etc)….
CEO that is more football focused vs commercial
More investment in the football department
More investment in development - multiple new hires
More professional / experienced coach.
How the hell would I know? I can make something up?
He knows how to put the dic.k in Dixon
I normally don’t reply to long posts but this so so so true
I’ll add the club is so far removed from reality
Can you at a minimum acknowledge you didn’t even want that group. You were arguing in favour of sticking with Brasher & X. If you were clearly wrong then what has changed now? Are you genuinely convinced by something they have done OR do you simply argue for the status quo no matter what that is?