Heās hugely talented, but could (and probably should) become a far far better player with the right guidance and direction heās not a great mark. He doesnāt work hard enough defensively. Not as fit as he should be.
Run that sort of talent level through the white bread vanilla good clubman factory that weāve assembled in the coachās box?
Oh my.
Bit hard to get a good read as thereās not that big a field of 190cm (ish) forwards these days.
Heās taller and heavier than Cramers and Membrey, shorter than Gunston but heavier. They are the main ones I can think of.
And he takes way way less contested marks (0.57 per game for Stringer, 0.89 a game for gunston, 1.02 per game for Cramers, 1.38 a game for Membrey ) and fewer marks in total (3.24 per game to 5.86 for Gunston & 4.18 for Cramers, 5.7 a game for Membrey).
Adelaide Tom Lynch, Dan menzel, the Silvagni kid at Carlton, Jack darling: all waaaay more prolific marks.
His favourite move is the shimmy his defender out of the way and run onto it out the back, Peter Hudson style. Which sides have wised up to. I think if he got a bit better overhead it would actually force defenders to play him a bit differently.
Only from memory, but I think our work around the ground has been ok (comparatively) and Hepps did most of the work. Where we have been smashed is in the centre square (where Jobe was our most effective clearance player). Stringer could go through that rotation pretty quickly
Still a chance to go to the cats apparently, according to some of the communication specialists.
Chris Grant still saying heās a strong chance to stay at the kennel
Out of the ex footy players I actually reckon he is one of the best. Not much competition I know but heās better than Bruce, zemplis, darcy and Russell. Huddo is better but donāt think he does TV anymore.