The 2024 Draft [no longer spec] Thread

His counter to which would probably just be take Roberts instead of Lual.
(FWIW i have no issues with what we did last year, none at all). I still won’t deny that it left us in a more difficult position once the change went through

2 Likes

GERREYN
JACK OUGH

OOOOOOOH BABY

4 Likes

We could have taken Roberts with Pick 39 instead of wasting it on Lual.

I know you like to provide nuance around discussions involving Dodoro, the problem is I just don’t care

3 Likes

I am all for trading Dees future first for pick 28 and something else in return if we have our sights set on Shanahan or Whitlock.

I would also drive backwards instead of sitting in traffic just to feel like I am moving though. Potentially the same thing.

3 Likes

Impressive work rate by Christian Moraes and an equally impressive ability to read the play in contested situations and find space on his opposition.

1 Like

damn @Ants mogged in 4k before GTA 6

Kako, Champion and Nguyen on our main list doesn’t look so bad.
We could also completely screw them and bid on him after they’ve already passed.
If the Eagles want him, they should just take him with their last active pick. Probably same deal with us for Nguyen.

1 Like

Also in full fairness, only one of those picks was used to get Roberts (The 4th).
The future 3rd was used to trade up for the pick we used to take Lual.

It’s possible if we’d done neither trade we could have just taken Roberts with our initial pick (Which was 52 at the time we traded it) and kept both futures.

I’m probably more bullish than most on Lual though, so happy to have him.

1 Like

Given that, would you take all 3 in the 20s and 40s, or just take 2 and go to the SSP period to work out the last?

Or what Dodoro did in the past.

Both are a waste of air at this point

1 Like

…but can he sing? :roll_eyes:

Trying to work out if you can still match a bid after passing.
My gut says it’s possible, though I can’t think of an example of it actually happening off the top of my head.

2 Likes

We had ■■■■ all picks and would’ve meant trading out of 2025 to get picks which as evident would’ve required a premium. Trading pick 9 the way we did allowed us to cover both scenarios.

1 Like

There’s nothing stopping them matching a bid if they pass. A team can’t pick again after passing, but they can match bids if they still have list spots. And the only way a team gets a chance to pass is if they have enough list spots open to choose not to fill one.

Edit: I remember this because it confused the hell out of me when it happened to us in 2020. We bid on Walker with pick 50, then Rioli with pick 51, then we passed, then when the dogs bid on Brand with pick 53, we matched the bid.

7 Likes

Just for a moment, imagine that Essendon did the deal that North did yesterday. The reaction on here has been bad enough when we’ve done good business this draft, Blitz would have crashed for sure.

3 Likes

“Draft Guru” Mick Ablett…FMD.

We will potentially get 4 kids that could be rated top 20 standard in any other draft…

The mind boggles.

2 Likes

I hate to say this Kako may not go as well as people hope on here. He can barely kick 40m and his passes are as loopy as tsatsas . I really hope he turns into a jet but these deficiencies may get shown up

1 Like

Been on the list for 20hrs and you have lost faith already??

3 Likes

We did it with Cody Brand if I recall.

We passed and then he was bid on and we matched.

4 Likes