Trade Talk 2019: who should we beat our chest like an ape about now?

Fitzpatrick probably had a hand in SOS landing at GWS; it doesn’t take a Rhode Scholar to imagine a scenario of SOS returning to Carlton

1 Like

Your team is only as good as the AFL allows your team to be.

Look at the two grand finalists. Collingwood and West Coast had the most free kicks in the comp and Collingwood had a ■■■■ easy draw.

If Shiel was going to hawthorn GWS would have taken pick 15 and that would be that but since it’s Essendon the AFL are going to make us pay out the ■■■.

5 Likes

more proof Nixon is completely cooked - is saying O’Meara will win the Brownlow next year

pretty sure he was saying the same this preseason

Maybe a three way trade between us, GWS and GC.

Ess: Sheil, Martin, P29 (GC)
GWS: P9 (ess), P19 (GC), Hartley. P34 (Ess)
GC: Patton, Dea. Next years 1st (Ess)

critique

2 Likes

Colyer to Gold Coast as steak knives

GC lose - Martin, 19 & 29
GC gain - Patton, Dea & 2019 ESS first

I don’t think that would work for them
Good attempt but I think they’d need more in the deal.

1 Like

How come no one is saying we are into Patton???

Efc In: Patton, Shiel,53, Carlton 2019 2nd rnd pick
Gws: Ceglar, 9, Ess 2019 first rd, Hartley
Hawks: Scully

When anyone talks about Scully coming to us, they assume it’s for a first rounder.

Hawthorn…it’s pick 69 and just for luck, here’s Patton as well.
Two first rounders for ■■■■ all because they have absolutely nothing to trade with.

As Sheeds said 4 or 5 years ago, stop making these ■■■■■■ stronger. Make them pay through the nose for everything they get.

23 Likes

Dont need key forwards & his knees are farked

1 Like

We have always been into Patton.
Gives us key forward depth if Joey goes down again.

at least port are trying to get market value for wingard.

3 x ACL & on $700-800K.

No thanks, unless super cheap (and do we really need any more KPP?)

Thats what Smack, Stewart, Brown and Hooker if needed is there for. Franga has also played forward

4 Likes

Disco stated in his interview that he is mindful of player payments. From that, I think Shiel is enough as $cully is greedy may get close to our cap limits.

1 Like

Agree with Bishop. We couldn’t afford to get both, and I think Essendon are confident in their young talent to just get the one big fish this recruiting period.

Call me paranoid, but is it possible that Hawks are taking Scully off GWS, sothe Giants have enough to keep Shiel and keep him away from Essendon? Conspiracy?

Agree.
Now runners can only go onto the ground after a goal, and seeing the mess the Filth’s runner made in the GF, there’s no place for the old fat ■■■■, dumb as ■■■■, but a good bloke, runner any more.
(Think Billy Brownless amongst others)

Stewart could be very useful in this role.
Would open up a list spot too.

1 Like

They need to cut $2mil +

Shiel is $1mil of that.

Not if they’re both our injured at the same time

2 Likes

I thought this myself. Adelaide also have pick 13.

That Nixon is a ■■■■■■ unit. Proper ■■■■■■.