I think last year we had a pretty clear strategy - they wanted to build depth in the list. They cut players, brought in experienced players they felt met needs and kept draft picks. That way, if we have 5-10 injuries, the wheels donât completely fall off.
I donât agree with the strategy. I donât think it worked. But it was clearly the way they wanted to go.
I think they believed the drop off last year was due to injuries, so thatâs why they went for filling with mature depth. This year with no injuries at all though, it proved it was simply the old Essendon, ingrained in the culture, mental fragility rearing itâs head again.
Just checked out Twomeyâs latest draft rankings. Important players from a bidding perspective:
Ashcroft (BRIS) = 1
Lombard (GC) = 12
Kako (ESS) = 15
So our anxiety regarding the Kako bid, would be preoccupying GC as well (regarding Lombard).
I started looking at trades with GC, and reached a couple of conclusions:
GC have a heap of picks. More then they needâŚI think they will be grateful for anyone willing to trade FUTURE picks to themâŚso we might be able to get Rosas for a pick swap plus an F3.
Richmond are also going to accumulate a large number of picks in this draft, including 1st roundersâŚthey could be a useful third party in any trades (theyâll already be sitting down with GC for the Rioli trade)âŚif Richmond can assist GC/ESS to position a pick safely before the academy kids, Richmond can have a bunch of picks in the late first round.
Anyway, Iâd personally be satisfied if the deal looked something like this:
ESS BEFORE = 8 + 28 + F3 + F4
ESS AFTER = 8 + 34 + Rosas + 46
Stringerâs manager would be out there highlighting the one year $400k contract is bullshit and trying to get it rewritten, rightfully so. Itâs unders for sure.