Trade talk - from August 2024

We got Caddy with pick 10

1 Like

thats the vision nino wants us all to share

I think last year we had a pretty clear strategy - they wanted to build depth in the list. They cut players, brought in experienced players they felt met needs and kept draft picks. That way, if we have 5-10 injuries, the wheels don’t completely fall off.

I don’t agree with the strategy. I don’t think it worked. But it was clearly the way they wanted to go.

I think you need to disregard Ashcroft, it gets confusing (Lombard could be bid earlier also) - so pick 9 in the open draft.

In any event, if Durham had not kicked that behind, pick 5.

Dat culture tho!

I got blasted on here many times saying how it’s doesn’t matter if the pick slides back.

It’s not that confusing IMO, we’ll likely be taking our first selection at pick 10 on the night is what I’m saying.

Pick 8 as it stands, pushed out two spots by Ashcroft bid and Battle compo.

Lombard bid likely comes shortly after our selection. But who knows, could even be slightly before.

Ashcroft and Lombard are not available to us, so where they get taken is pretty inconsequential.

Anyway, we are arguing semantics. We’ve found ourselves (again) in literally the worst possible position.

4 Likes

given how easy hawks and port have traded / free agency in tall defenders…does it show that Dodoro wasted too many early picks on tall defenders.

Ridley (22)
reid (10)
Cox (8)
hayes (25)

Even we got McKay

3 Likes

“Better than being a laughing stock and finishing bottom 4. That would be unbearable.”

5 Likes

Remember when we were a destination club last year?

What a great way to fk that up by ■■■■■■■■ the bed all over again and showing everyone we are still a ■■■■ club.

Rant not over, just on pause.

4 Likes

Senior players at Essendon shouldn’t have games triggers. Not when the coach will never, ever drop them.

5 Likes

FKG LOL

whats the 3rd option?

Be Jake Stringer

5 Likes

stupid, stupid, stupid.

1 Like

I think they believed the drop off last year was due to injuries, so that’s why they went for filling with mature depth. This year with no injuries at all though, it proved it was simply the old Essendon, ingrained in the culture, mental fragility rearing it’s head again.

I judge it on the last 30 minutes we played. Nothing before that happened

Just checked out Twomey’s latest draft rankings. Important players from a bidding perspective:

  • Ashcroft (BRIS) = 1
  • Lombard (GC) = 12
  • Kako (ESS) = 15

So our anxiety regarding the Kako bid, would be preoccupying GC as well (regarding Lombard).

I started looking at trades with GC, and reached a couple of conclusions:

  • GC have a heap of picks. More then they need…I think they will be grateful for anyone willing to trade FUTURE picks to them…so we might be able to get Rosas for a pick swap plus an F3.
  • Richmond are also going to accumulate a large number of picks in this draft, including 1st rounders…they could be a useful third party in any trades (they’ll already be sitting down with GC for the Rioli trade)…if Richmond can assist GC/ESS to position a pick safely before the academy kids, Richmond can have a bunch of picks in the late first round.

Anyway, I’d personally be satisfied if the deal looked something like this:

ESS BEFORE = 8 + 28 + F3 + F4
ESS AFTER = 8 + 34 + Rosas + 46

3 Likes

Stringer and Lav’s managers out there doing double overtime pretending there may be opposition interest. Don’t buy it for a minute.

13 Likes

Yeah why would any team want a dude who just kicked 42 goals this season.
Shocking if true.

4 Likes

Stringer’s manager would be out there highlighting the one year $400k contract is bullshit and trying to get it rewritten, rightfully so. It’s unders for sure.

3 Likes