Whilst Shiel is more dynamic.
I think as far as being stronger in contest, tackling intent, more creative by hand including under physical heat and better ability when fwd/overhead I’d go Parker also.
Whilst Shiel is more dynamic.
I think as far as being stronger in contest, tackling intent, more creative by hand including under physical heat and better ability when fwd/overhead I’d go Parker also.
Lol.
Tom Browne just said that the Swans have ruled out trading Parker.
Let’s get back to our roots.
Shiel and Setterfield please.
What’s happened to the Setterfield talk? All gone very quiet.
Which makes a heap of sense. VC and hugely important player and only 25!
I didn’t bother getting involved in the Parker talk. Was never going to happen.
I like Parker for his goal kicking.
I guess Shiel is more of the jet style player. I think we need a more inside mid which Parker is.
Not to say Shiel is a bad player. I think he has more injury concerns and doesn’t hit the scoreboard .
I didn’t bother getting involved in the Parker talk. Was never going to happen.
Didn’t want him anyway. Dud
Never wanted him in the first place*
*may or may not be true
Who would everyone rather have? Parker or Shiel?
Shiel
Puke Sarker
Duke Farker
Fark Hardar
I think he has more injury concerns and doesn’t hit the scoreboard
Why do you keep saying that when i already told you how many games he played the last 3 years?
Shiel : 22, 25, 23 = 70 Games
Parker: 22, 24, 26 = 72 Games
Shutup Tom. You have had a poor 2018 so far.
Shiel gets injured too often, anyway.
parker is fkg garbage. picked after steinberg therefore has to be worse.
Ah yes old mate stainberg
Hard-running mid, speedy forward could change clubs in October