Clarke and Ralph can’t see how Dangerfield gets off from this “as impressive as Dangerfield was”
Yeah but bad luck, head went boing so hes screwed. Or should be i should say.
Ralph saying that if Dangerfield does get off because of how emotive and persuasive he was…but it wouldn’t be the right call and may result in another rule change.
Fark off lol
Then proceed to tell me how I should only stock triple quilted tp made from recycled Egyptian cotton sheets that he personally grew the cotton for.
This is fun.
1 Like
Lol. The AFL are a joke.
1 Like
lol. judges hate that sort of smug bullshit answer. i hope that answer crucifies him
1 Like
Danger going with the “I’m not wearing a tie at all” scenario.
1 Like
Having evacuated his sandwich made from your ingredients, he would then emerge from your bedroom in your most expensive suit and say he ‘has to go to deal with these morons at the MRO’. After hugging your wife deeply and thanking her for her hospitality he would leave in your car, promising to top the fuel up ‘a couple of litres’ at the nearest United fuel station and leave the car there for you to pick up in the morning.
1 Like
and we would 100% not challenge.
though we did challenge his tackling suspension last year and lost.
2 Likes
They don’t have to tackle perfectly… just in such a way that doesn’t slam their opponent’s head into the turf.
5 Likes
no, it’s implying, don’t take them to ground unless it’s beyond your control not to.
1 Like
Yep.
By pinning both arms, and taking responsibility of Walsh’s welfare, Dangerfield also took responsibility for any resulting head contact.
He can’t pin both arms, which results in head contact, and go “oops. My bad. I tried though”
1 Like
Like every player over the last 18 months that has been suspended for this. Why do danger and the cats think they are above the rest
2 Likes
Certain players get different treatment. Arguably he’s fallen out of that category, but we shall see.
2 Likes
I thought Danger claimed that he already was perfect.
2 Likes