Yeh you tell him Gleeson, smug geelong pig.
Sounds more like Gleeson is advocating for him…
Obviously missing tone/context though
So to sum up; it was Walsh’s fault.
Yes, the ball under his chest made his head get closer to the ground. I see. So he must’ve been in an upside down, pile drive type position.
Is there a term for that?
The words “blaming” and “victim” come to mind.
“Walsh should be suspended your honour”
and owes Dangerfield an apology
And a sandwich.
It’s like that time when Peter Caven head butted Tony Locketts elbow.
Harry Jones thought so too
either pinning the arms and tackling is a suspendible thing or it isn’t
the tribunal has deemed it to be a suspendible thing way too many time to say it’s now not a thing
this should be an easy appeal to dismiss
David Zita just said that he can’t see how Dangerfield gets off with everything that’s happened and the fact that both arms were pinned.
Did say that Dangerfield put in a massive effort to get off though (I giggled at the choice of wording)
Has the prosecution (AFL) said anything yet or is this still the Danger show?
I’ve heard enough.
Lock him up and throw away the key.
Have Geelong mentioned that they are playing the Bombers this week? I would have thought they would have led with that?
The only acceptable outcome here is to suspend an Essendon player