If it makes you mad then step away. It’s not black and white like you say, some people don’t speak for all people in terms of accusations, and I get the Trump dislike but it makes Democrats blind to criticism if you deny the obvious. I think it takes a little bit of purely head in the sand arrogance to not acklowedge that Biden is completley and utterly past it as a president, should be nowhere near it, and the debate confirmed for a lot of people what they already suspected, that he was completley senile and age had ravaged the mind of what used to be a very sharp debater. He was literally struggling to string a sentence together, and he could barely walk unassisted. It was nice to see him string a 7 minute interview on The View recently but it’s already over for him. I understand the usual reply to this is the usual defensive knee jerk reaction from Democrats is to then spiel about Trump, if that makes them feel better about Biden then they do what they need to do, but he will be remembered as a good president.
I don’t know about the Ukraine part you’re talking about, but if you’re talking about Hunter, I don’t think Biden was a mastermind behind anything in helping him, if the worst thing he did was help his son make some money then he’d sit next to every president in that regards to helping those close to them propser, for me that in a non issue regardless of if that was true.
Kamala Harris had the worst approval rating for any vice-president in history, independent experts ranked her very low due to poor helping in Biden decision making and no achievements in policy assignments, right near Pence. Also her main assigmnent in immigration was handled poorly and has now grown into a major focus, rightly or wrongly she’s hurt her own party. I also disagree that she is a war mongerer and a wanna be dictator, those claims are ludicrious, I just think she’s a below average politician going up against a poor one in Trump.
I understand the argument about allowing too many migrants into the country and how easily they enter and become legal which I think is the greavance of many in the US, but these aren’t illegals which is what you’re stating here.
Is it true that this CBP one app can get you into the USA without providing any proof of identity etc? Seems like all you need is to upload a photo of yourself and you skip the normal migration process and will possibly be able to end up a citizen in the near future if the democrats win the election.
Would the bolded part mean she didn’t contribute much help, or helped him make poor decisions?
I ask because I see in this thread a lot that Biden AND Harris keep wars going abroad, they both did this, they both did that, like her as president would just be an extension as what she’s already done.
But what’s to say she can’t step into the role with her team and improve international relations and do a better job than Trump, who had a turn and was poor? Many dems would disagree with a lot of Biden’s decisions, particularly handling of Israel, but how much of that can be pinned on Harris?
(Following a train of thought in the thread here, I don’t expect you to have to answer all of that.)
An eligible foreign visitor in this case seems to include anyone who says they need asylum. Do you have to upload a passport and/or other proof of identity or can you get into the USA without them? Do you need any proof of being a real asylum seeker and not just an economic migrant? In videos I have seen it appears that a photo is the only thing you actually need to upload.
Obviously but havent Kamala Harris and other democrats basically said they will make it very easy for people who have entered the country in this way or illegally to get on a path to citizenship which would mean this method essentially skips the proper migration process?
Does that Visa come with housing, spending money and a potential path to citizenship?
I may have worded it poorly, I think it’s she didn’t contribute: “Her lower rank reflected a combination of factors, including her minimal role in Biden’s decision-making and a lack of significant achievements in her policy assignments”.
As to your other questions, I don’t know how much you can pin on Kamala, I’d think people just relate her being ineffective at solving the issue as opposed to being held responsible, no one was stopping Israel from retaliating in Gaza, but perhaps finding a fix to the issue has been a proble.
Potentially, Kamala could come in and improve international relations, yes it’s possible. My worry is I think Biden at his best is a million times better than Kamala, I’ve stated before I would have voted for Biden in 2020. Walz too would be better, but personally I just don’t see Kamala being able to do it based on everything I have seen from her but that’s just my opinion. She’s been hidden from interviews for good reason. She had a good debate against Trump, as a prosecutor she knew how to bait Trump with his giant ego but otherwise she’s generally quite poor in most other regards. Trump is poor too at negotiations and diplomacy make no mistake, but threat wise remains intimidating which Kamala doesn’t have. A legitimate concern is the detterent of him having nothing to lose in his last term and happy to blacklist countries that don’t support him which could make countries bend to his will. That’s not really diplomacy, but it’s more effective than a walk-over (which is in my opinion what Kamala would be.)
For me the war mongering part isn’t a big issue for me anyway like it seems to be with some posters, it’s just a smart ploy from the right to get people thinking “you know what, we do have a lot of wars these days.” It will get a few votes. Make no mistake, the more the war the escalates in Iran/Israel, the better for Trump. That was a bit of a ramble but I hoped I answered your question in some manner.
The app is being used because it requires proof of identity and other documentation.
It schedules appointments it does not grant asylum. So if you want to seek entry you have to do it via the app. The app only schedules an appointment at an official border crossing. National security and public health checks are done.
How low can Trump go? He’s now saying that Fed assistance to the Helene affected is falling short because so much money has been siphoned off to be spent on illegal migrants.
As I understand it, the FEMA budget would go through Congress.
He hasn’t addressed the State budgets for emergency assistance. As with Australia’s Federal system, the States have emergency assistance budgets. Has he checked the budgets of the Republican Governors and how they are performing in assistance? After all, he wants to drain the swamp and devolve decision making to the States ( as in abortion measures).
Word has it that one State Governor has set the criteria for purchase of Bibles for schools in a way that only the Trump Bible provider can meet. Trump gets a cut for every Bible sold.
It’s so sordid for someone in public office to rip off State budgets.
mods need to get rid of him . obviuosly trolling . we are not allowed to talk about certain subjects but he’s allowed to troll in here and elsewhere at will