But I see you were liking all lolfyers posts calling people *tards so Iâm not surprised youâve sided with your fellow buddy calling people offensive slags.
Sigh. One last time.
Itâs a thread about American politics & politicians. It would be better to direct your outrage towards their offensive behaviour than towards other posters.
And I didnât say many of us do what Trump Jnr did. I said many of us get side-tracked into discussing one another.
FWIW I generally like Loflyerâs posts & choice of language, but prefer not to see 'tard used. Again though, there are far worse things going on in the US more worthy of your outrage.
You donât appear to have objected to various *tards in the past (quite rare, mostly of the lib variety, and mostly quoting or sarcastically-semi-quoting the right).
I searched function the lib variety and could only find again lolfyer using the phrase and Donmania from ages ago. Please direct me to the poters that used the word so I can condemn them also without question.
Itâs a great thing for democracy. Itâs a great to all the tryhard moral compasses out there who want a population of sheep to follow their own specific views and needs.
Another lesson that the media HQ in New York and/or LA donât control the narrative.
For a âtoo close to callâ election this time last week () ⌠itâs a massacre.
I think itâs obvious that youâve liked lolfyers posts and âchoice of langaugeâ in the past when heâs consistently used disparraging remarks, abusiuve and offensive slags to people he doesnât agree with, and thatâs not including the âswallowing Trumps loadâ remarks and commenting how Vance âlikes to â â â â furnitureâ. Itâs obvious why youâre making excuses for him and his reherotic, youâre letting him off the hook for being offensive to people with disabilities whilst also sooking about Donald Trump Jnr.
And thatâs fine, you can agree with him, but please no more BS about how you hate abusive, sexist or racist behaviour from you from now on, otherwise youâre a bigger part of the problem by not calling it out. Hows that car wash going?
How is having one party control head of state, house, senate & supreme court (not to mention information flow via X) good for democracy, esp. when they have plans to fill the PS and judiciary with loyalists? Sounds like the opposite of âgood for democracyâ.
I guess itâs good for the nation if thatâs what they wanted, as it makes it easier for them to get their policies through without it being contested. And what are âloyalistsâ and how does it differ from regular parties installing their own âloyalistsâ or members, and if itâs only specific to one party, then what do Democrats fill them with? Traitors? Or is that a phrase intended to infer a dictatorship? This is an actual question too.
The people have had their say. And done so emphatically.
It doesnât match your own personal political views so therefore itâs undemocratic? Not sure thatâs how it works⌠but you are one of many (including the Hollywood âeliteâ) at the moment who seem a bit blurred on the issue.
Sounds like you are a culture warrior.
I asked how Trumpâs victory is good for democracy & gave you some solid reasons why it is not. I donât think âthe people have had their sayâ is an adequate answer.
Geez I thought the story about the FEMA supervisor instructing aid workers to skip houses with Trump signs in Florida was just another one of their nonsense beatupsâŚ
Because the people had their say. Thats exactly how democracy works and unlike the last time when he lost the popular vote to Hillary the majority actually did vote for Trump.