#12 Mark Baguley


#1805

Also… it would be real nice if people stopped being farkin dicks, continuing jokes about someone’s dead father.


#1806

How many posters on here knew about Lamb’s dad before this incident?
Why aren’t the media asking Lamb to confirm or deny he sledged Bag’s appearance?

If the media investigated and found the actual comments made by Bags & Lamb - then it would be easy to confirm that Bags made a general comment which Lamb misinterpreted in the heat of the battle.


#1807

What about dead mother ? Or sister ? Or wife ? Or Dog ? Goldfish ?

My Mum and Dad are dead, say whatever you like about them. It is a reflection on you, not me or them, so why give a Fark?


#1808

He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.


#1809

Concur. Lamb is a worm, but some of the posts on here…


#1810

Deserves 1 more game just on the stregth and polish of his statement.
Assuming of course he had some input.


#1811

Good to see that only one poster has admitted they got it wrong in jumping on bags over this.

The rest of you make me ■■■■■■■ sick.

There’s been a lot of justified criticism of this club for being spineless recently. You dickheads are worse.


#1812

Wow. Im shocked. Who would have thought that it was just a misunderstanding? I was convinced that Baguley is a carnt and likes to make jokes about players dead parents.


#1813

Headlines 1st
Wild speculation 2nd
Outrage 3rd

Investigations …whatever


#1814

Apologies … Never


#1815

All of this makes Bolton look more and more childish. Insecure little man trying to impose himself on the league and shed that ‘always happy’ persona by abusing an opposition player. Leadership personified.


#1816

The EFC are too gutless to do anything like that, the AFL might not like it. Back a player the media has totally bashed with words. The club from the top to the bottom and the few individuals who are the exception, will be shut up or moved on. The EFC are an embarrassment.


#1817

Media beat up before getting both sides of the story…you even get to see footage of Bags looking to discuss the incident with Lamb…you can see Bags in apologetic but nope


#1818

Absolute joke that the Rage is still running articles online which refuse to acknowledge that Baguley was provoked in the form of vilification. There are two sides to the story and they have chosen to only report one.

Now where have I seen that before…


#1819

Would be nice if our gutless president would tell them to run a retraction but all I’m hearing from Essendon is crickets. At least Koch stuck up for Powell pepper.


#1820

SEN is quoting Paul Marsh of AFLPA criticising the media beat-up of the incident, in which he also noted that Bolton was not aware of what was said when he abused Bags.
The fact that the EFC put Bags carefully worded statement on its website indicates that the club supports his version.
But no-one is having a go at Lamb’s sledging of Bags physical appearance.


#1821

Gleeson’s a Collingwood fan, hates the bombers.


#1822

Robbo did last night on 360


#1823

He started the shamble


#1824

And hasn’t amended his original article to reflect the support of Bags.