Finlayson is 26 next year, this year is the 3rd season GWS have put him on the trade table within the last 5 years, he is unprofessional, he is a flog and he is not in their best 22.
Sure Bobby Hill hasnât exactly tore the competition apart, but I really rate Ruttenâs ability to get the best out of players. GWS donât play an attacking brand of football so it doesnât really suit small forwards.
We thrive on attacking football, pressure and chaos around goals. I honestly believe Hill (and Stengle) can be 30 goal forwards in our system. They certainly have the latent talent.
Would our two picks in the 50âs be enough for Hill? We definitely need a small forward but you canât give up to much for someone who hasnât really done much.
Everyone keeps saying trade our first pick next year we donât need it, but so far I havenât heard anyone say one of the Davey boys is going to go top 10, so if we finish 8th or even a little worse, wouldnât we be best to keep our first, get a good kid and then use other picks to get the Davey boys?
Thereâs now way weâll use a future first this year. Weâre fairly certain to have a crack at King next year and that wouldnât leave us with enough to trade.
Imo it isnât to do with the Daveys at all. More our desire to have multiple 1st round picks this year. This is a way we can do it. If we want a first round pick next year we can trade back in if we want
Because we would need to trade our first and future first to get King. If we have traded our second for next year in the pursuit of Hill then we have no 1st or 2nd round pick. Thatâs against the rules right?
I guess we could try and bring our 2023 second forward if we use a future second for Hill, allowing us to pursue King with 2 firsts (if thatâs what we want to do)